ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next旋转仪器的抗循环疲劳分析

Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić
{"title":"ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next旋转仪器的抗循环疲劳分析","authors":"Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić","doi":"10.2298/sgs2203109s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active\n phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium\n (NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their\n superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of\n this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in\n ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full\n rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and\n twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The\n instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at\n an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each\n instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture\n (NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater\n resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value\n was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments\n (p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically\n significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared\n to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that\n the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher\n compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments\",\"authors\":\"Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/sgs2203109s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active\\n phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium\\n (NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their\\n superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of\\n this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in\\n ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full\\n rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and\\n twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The\\n instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at\\n an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each\\n instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture\\n (NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater\\n resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value\\n was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments\\n (p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically\\n significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared\\n to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that\\n the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher\\n compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2203109s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2203109s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。根管预备是感染和非感染牙齿治疗中最重要的活跃阶段之一。镍钛(NiTi)器械由于其优于不锈钢的性能而越来越多地用于牙髓治疗。本研究的目的是分析和比较ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next旋转NiTi器械在模拟管中全旋转时的循环疲劳。材料和方法。本研究分析了12台ProTaper Next和12台ProTaper Universal仪器。这些仪器在一个以45度角塞进金属块的人工管道中进行测试。转角半径为5毫米。测量各仪器的工作时间直至断裂,并计算断裂循环次数(NCF)。结果。与ProTaper Universal相比,ProTaper Next仪器显示出更强的抗循环疲劳能力。ProTaper Next仪器的NCF值(1,296.83 ~ 20.2)显著高于ProTaper Next (p<0.001)。ProTaper Universal(4.52±0.33)器械的骨折碎片平均长度显著高于ProTaper Next(3.82±0.27)器械(p<0.001)。结论。结果表明,ProTaper Next仪器的抗循环疲劳性能优于ProTaper Universal仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments
Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments (p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信