大部分重用:另一个代码共享选项

P. McCoog, Rick Smith
{"title":"大部分重用:另一个代码共享选项","authors":"P. McCoog, Rick Smith","doi":"10.1145/258366.258382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of code as reused or leveraged is an oversimplification of a problem which forces too many soflware components to be treated as leveraged code. If we at Hewlett Packard-San Diego Division were forced to continue to pay the high cost of traditional leverage for all code that was not absolutely identical in each instantiation, we could not remain competitive. We began to look at the difference between leverage and reuse as a continuum and found that a code classification known as “Mostly Reuse” is very common and can be handled much more efllciently than traditional leverage. This has allowed us to develop derivative products much quicker and cheaper than before.","PeriodicalId":270366,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","volume":"3 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mostly reuse: another code sharing option\",\"authors\":\"P. McCoog, Rick Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/258366.258382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classification of code as reused or leveraged is an oversimplification of a problem which forces too many soflware components to be treated as leveraged code. If we at Hewlett Packard-San Diego Division were forced to continue to pay the high cost of traditional leverage for all code that was not absolutely identical in each instantiation, we could not remain competitive. We began to look at the difference between leverage and reuse as a continuum and found that a code classification known as “Mostly Reuse” is very common and can be handled much more efllciently than traditional leverage. This has allowed us to develop derivative products much quicker and cheaper than before.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/258366.258382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/258366.258382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将代码分类为重用或利用是对问题的过度简化,它迫使太多的软件组件被视为利用代码。如果我们在Hewlett Packard-San Diego分部被迫继续为所有在每个实例中不是完全相同的代码支付传统杠杆的高成本,我们就无法保持竞争力。我们开始将杠杆和重用作为一个连续体来看待,并发现一种被称为“大部分重用”的代码分类是非常常见的,并且可以比传统的杠杆更有效地处理。这使我们能够比以前更快、更便宜地开发衍生产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mostly reuse: another code sharing option
The classification of code as reused or leveraged is an oversimplification of a problem which forces too many soflware components to be treated as leveraged code. If we at Hewlett Packard-San Diego Division were forced to continue to pay the high cost of traditional leverage for all code that was not absolutely identical in each instantiation, we could not remain competitive. We began to look at the difference between leverage and reuse as a continuum and found that a code classification known as “Mostly Reuse” is very common and can be handled much more efllciently than traditional leverage. This has allowed us to develop derivative products much quicker and cheaper than before.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信