教师的后台:论教育技术话语中学习者驱动、学校驱动和数据驱动的变革

Felicitas Macgilchrist
{"title":"教师的后台:论教育技术话语中学习者驱动、学校驱动和数据驱动的变革","authors":"Felicitas Macgilchrist","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/4ukqj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally assumed that edtech providers aim to erase power and politics from contemporary education. To explore the discourse on digital education, this paper draws on discourse analysis of ethnographic interviews with for-profit and non-profit organizations in the field. It asks (i) what industry insiders describe as driving change in contemporary educational technology (edtech), and (ii) whether new actors/technologies are shaping a novel educational hegemony, and if so, what this hegemony looks like. This paper presents initial findings from an ongoing project. It observes a shift in who/what drives change: The teacher used to be seen as key. Today, three different drivers are named: (1) learners (individual dimension), (2) schools (systemic dimension), (3) data (analytics dimension). Overall, the paper suggests that power and politics are not at all erased from the edtech industry’s accounts of digital technologies. It illustrates how the socio-material affordances engineered into contemporary technologies effect a change from \"education\" to \"learning\", invite particular teaching practices, and thus affect power relations in education.","PeriodicalId":397056,"journal":{"name":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backstaging the teacher: On learner-driven, school-driven and data-driven change in educational technology discourse\",\"authors\":\"Felicitas Macgilchrist\",\"doi\":\"10.31235/osf.io/4ukqj\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is generally assumed that edtech providers aim to erase power and politics from contemporary education. To explore the discourse on digital education, this paper draws on discourse analysis of ethnographic interviews with for-profit and non-profit organizations in the field. It asks (i) what industry insiders describe as driving change in contemporary educational technology (edtech), and (ii) whether new actors/technologies are shaping a novel educational hegemony, and if so, what this hegemony looks like. This paper presents initial findings from an ongoing project. It observes a shift in who/what drives change: The teacher used to be seen as key. Today, three different drivers are named: (1) learners (individual dimension), (2) schools (systemic dimension), (3) data (analytics dimension). Overall, the paper suggests that power and politics are not at all erased from the edtech industry’s accounts of digital technologies. It illustrates how the socio-material affordances engineered into contemporary technologies effect a change from \\\"education\\\" to \\\"learning\\\", invite particular teaching practices, and thus affect power relations in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":397056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4ukqj\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4ukqj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

人们普遍认为,教育技术提供者的目的是消除当代教育中的权力和政治。为了探索数字教育的话语,本文借鉴了对该领域营利性和非营利性组织的民族志访谈的话语分析。它询问了(1)业内人士描述的推动当代教育技术变革的因素是什么,以及(2)新的参与者/技术是否正在塑造一种新的教育霸权,如果是,这种霸权是什么样子的。本文介绍了一个正在进行的项目的初步发现。它观察到谁/什么推动变革的转变:教师过去被视为关键。今天,三种不同的驱动因素被命名为:(1)学习者(个人维度),(2)学校(系统维度),(3)数据(分析维度)。总的来说,这篇论文表明,权力和政治并没有从教育科技行业对数字技术的描述中抹去。它说明了设计成当代技术的社会物质支持如何影响从“教育”到“学习”的变化,邀请特定的教学实践,从而影响教育中的权力关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Backstaging the teacher: On learner-driven, school-driven and data-driven change in educational technology discourse
It is generally assumed that edtech providers aim to erase power and politics from contemporary education. To explore the discourse on digital education, this paper draws on discourse analysis of ethnographic interviews with for-profit and non-profit organizations in the field. It asks (i) what industry insiders describe as driving change in contemporary educational technology (edtech), and (ii) whether new actors/technologies are shaping a novel educational hegemony, and if so, what this hegemony looks like. This paper presents initial findings from an ongoing project. It observes a shift in who/what drives change: The teacher used to be seen as key. Today, three different drivers are named: (1) learners (individual dimension), (2) schools (systemic dimension), (3) data (analytics dimension). Overall, the paper suggests that power and politics are not at all erased from the edtech industry’s accounts of digital technologies. It illustrates how the socio-material affordances engineered into contemporary technologies effect a change from "education" to "learning", invite particular teaching practices, and thus affect power relations in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信