{"title":"根据第17条对破产的预测。13 co. 3 c.c.i.:二进制分类测试和线性鉴别分析的有效性","authors":"A. D’Amico, Alessandro Danovi","doi":"10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2020.1.1253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that insolvency forecasting for SMEs will soon become a relevant topic for \nentrepreneurs and consultants alike, in the wake of the upcoming reform of the Italian \nbankruptcy law (d.lgs. 14/2019 – Codice della crisi d’impresa e dell’insolvenza), and that \ndata scarcity is the main obstacle to the development of predictive tools for SMEs. In order to \nintroduce the topic to a broader audience, we present an analysis of the history of insolvency \nprediction models under the light of the reformed legislation, outlining a general framework \nfor the construction of insolvency prediction models for and by Italian small and medium \nenterprises, in-house or with help from their consultants, in compliance with Article 13 sub. \n3 of the Business distress and insolvency Code. We employ the framework to build two \nclasses of models. The first class employs an outdated approach, the univariate dichotomous \nclassification test. The second adopts one that is more widely used in SMEs insolvency \nprediction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). We then perform a comparison between the \npredictive abilities of the two. We draw the conclusion that the former is more effective than \nthe latter, within the limited boundaries of the experiment. Such result is mildly inconsistent \nwith the literature on the topic. We underline how the scarcity of data about Italian SME \nlimits, both in the empirical set-up and in real life, the accuracy of the LDA. This leads to the \nconclusion that, in this context, a simpler statistical approach may yield a more satisfactory \noutput. Finally, we suggest how both models could be improved in future research.","PeriodicalId":140258,"journal":{"name":"Impresa Progetto - Electronic Journal of Management","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La previsione dell’insolvenza ex art. 13 co. 3 C.c.i.: efficacia del test di classificazione binario e dell’analisi discriminante lineare\",\"authors\":\"A. D’Amico, Alessandro Danovi\",\"doi\":\"10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2020.1.1253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that insolvency forecasting for SMEs will soon become a relevant topic for \\nentrepreneurs and consultants alike, in the wake of the upcoming reform of the Italian \\nbankruptcy law (d.lgs. 14/2019 – Codice della crisi d’impresa e dell’insolvenza), and that \\ndata scarcity is the main obstacle to the development of predictive tools for SMEs. In order to \\nintroduce the topic to a broader audience, we present an analysis of the history of insolvency \\nprediction models under the light of the reformed legislation, outlining a general framework \\nfor the construction of insolvency prediction models for and by Italian small and medium \\nenterprises, in-house or with help from their consultants, in compliance with Article 13 sub. \\n3 of the Business distress and insolvency Code. We employ the framework to build two \\nclasses of models. The first class employs an outdated approach, the univariate dichotomous \\nclassification test. The second adopts one that is more widely used in SMEs insolvency \\nprediction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). We then perform a comparison between the \\npredictive abilities of the two. We draw the conclusion that the former is more effective than \\nthe latter, within the limited boundaries of the experiment. Such result is mildly inconsistent \\nwith the literature on the topic. We underline how the scarcity of data about Italian SME \\nlimits, both in the empirical set-up and in real life, the accuracy of the LDA. This leads to the \\nconclusion that, in this context, a simpler statistical approach may yield a more satisfactory \\noutput. Finally, we suggest how both models could be improved in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Impresa Progetto - Electronic Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Impresa Progetto - Electronic Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2020.1.1253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impresa Progetto - Electronic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2020.1.1253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们认为,随着意大利破产法即将进行改革,中小企业破产预测将很快成为企业家和顾问的相关话题。2019年11月14日-《危机与破产》(Codice della crisi d 'impresa e dell ' insolvency),数据稀缺是中小企业预测工具开发的主要障碍。为了向更广泛的受众介绍这一主题,我们根据改革后的立法对破产预测模型的历史进行了分析,概述了根据《企业困境和破产法》第13条第3款,为意大利中小型企业或由其内部或在其顾问的帮助下构建破产预测模型的一般框架。我们使用这个框架来构建两类模型。第一类采用了过时的方法,即单变量二分类检验。第二种方法采用了在中小企业破产预测中应用更为广泛的线性判别分析(LDA)。然后我们对两者的预测能力进行比较。我们得出结论,在有限的实验范围内,前者比后者更有效。这样的结果与有关该主题的文献略有不一致。我们强调关于意大利中小企业的数据的稀缺性如何限制,无论是在经验设置和现实生活中,LDA的准确性。由此得出的结论是,在这种情况下,更简单的统计方法可能产生更令人满意的结果。最后,我们提出了在未来的研究中如何改进这两个模型。
La previsione dell’insolvenza ex art. 13 co. 3 C.c.i.: efficacia del test di classificazione binario e dell’analisi discriminante lineare
We argue that insolvency forecasting for SMEs will soon become a relevant topic for
entrepreneurs and consultants alike, in the wake of the upcoming reform of the Italian
bankruptcy law (d.lgs. 14/2019 – Codice della crisi d’impresa e dell’insolvenza), and that
data scarcity is the main obstacle to the development of predictive tools for SMEs. In order to
introduce the topic to a broader audience, we present an analysis of the history of insolvency
prediction models under the light of the reformed legislation, outlining a general framework
for the construction of insolvency prediction models for and by Italian small and medium
enterprises, in-house or with help from their consultants, in compliance with Article 13 sub.
3 of the Business distress and insolvency Code. We employ the framework to build two
classes of models. The first class employs an outdated approach, the univariate dichotomous
classification test. The second adopts one that is more widely used in SMEs insolvency
prediction: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). We then perform a comparison between the
predictive abilities of the two. We draw the conclusion that the former is more effective than
the latter, within the limited boundaries of the experiment. Such result is mildly inconsistent
with the literature on the topic. We underline how the scarcity of data about Italian SME
limits, both in the empirical set-up and in real life, the accuracy of the LDA. This leads to the
conclusion that, in this context, a simpler statistical approach may yield a more satisfactory
output. Finally, we suggest how both models could be improved in future research.