话语伦理与实践知识。实用推理的稳定结构

Olga Ramírez Calle
{"title":"话语伦理与实践知识。实用推理的稳定结构","authors":"Olga Ramírez Calle","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the face of the criticism raised against Habermas distinction between morality and ethics and its universalist foundation of morality, it is argued that the priority of moral objectives results constitutively out of the normative reflection structure of the thinking subject, on which depend both the life objectives and corresponding social order in the specific contexts, as well as the personal ones; expanding, thus, the frame of the structurally constitutive in practical reflection. Additionally, the persistence of the Kantian moral thinking in the foundational architecture of ED is reconsidered.","PeriodicalId":364417,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ética del discurso y conocimiento práctico. Estructuras estables para el razonamiento práctico\",\"authors\":\"Olga Ramírez Calle\",\"doi\":\"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the face of the criticism raised against Habermas distinction between morality and ethics and its universalist foundation of morality, it is argued that the priority of moral objectives results constitutively out of the normative reflection structure of the thinking subject, on which depend both the life objectives and corresponding social order in the specific contexts, as well as the personal ones; expanding, thus, the frame of the structurally constitutive in practical reflection. Additionally, the persistence of the Kantian moral thinking in the foundational architecture of ED is reconsidered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对哈贝马斯的道德与伦理区分及其道德的普遍主义基础所受到的批评,认为道德目标的优先性是思维主体的规范性反思结构的构成,它既取决于特定情境下的生活目标和相应的社会秩序,也取决于个人的生活目标和社会秩序;从而在实践反思中拓展了结构本构的框架。此外,本文还对康德道德思想在教育学基础架构中的持久性进行了重新思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ética del discurso y conocimiento práctico. Estructuras estables para el razonamiento práctico
In the face of the criticism raised against Habermas distinction between morality and ethics and its universalist foundation of morality, it is argued that the priority of moral objectives results constitutively out of the normative reflection structure of the thinking subject, on which depend both the life objectives and corresponding social order in the specific contexts, as well as the personal ones; expanding, thus, the frame of the structurally constitutive in practical reflection. Additionally, the persistence of the Kantian moral thinking in the foundational architecture of ED is reconsidered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信