基于CREATETM-AV Helios的非定常轴向和前飞条件下旋翼的CFD湍流过渡模型验证

R. Jain
{"title":"基于CREATETM-AV Helios的非定常轴向和前飞条件下旋翼的CFD湍流过渡模型验证","authors":"R. Jain","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) turbulence transition models are evaluated for rotors in unsteady axial and in forward flight conditions. The study is carried out using CREATETM -AV Helios with NASA codes, Overflow and FUN3D, as the near-body solvers. Three transition models are considered, Amplification Factor Transport (AFT), Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt (LM), and the LM with a crossflow transition model. The LM model is modified to allow for Galilean invariance. The validation study utilizes the data from two recent rotor tests where unsteady transition measurements were obtained on the upper (suction) surface of rotor blades using a novel application of the Differential Infrared Thermography (DIT) technique. The first configuration, the DLR RTG rotor, is a four-blade, 2.13-foot radius rotor in axial flow with pitching blades, operating at Reynolds numbers of 3.2 x 10-5 and 1.7 x 10-5> at three quarter radius, for the two test cases studied. The second configuration, the PSP rotor, is a model-scale, 5.58-foot radius, three-blade rotor in a high-advance-ratio, high-thrust forward flight condition, mounted on a ROBIN-Mod7 fuselage, and operating at a hover Reynolds number of 1.25 x 10-6 at three quarter radius. For this rotor, the validation study also included the DIT measurements on the lower (pressure) surface. Both configurations exhibit large unsteadiness in transition locations. CFD predictions are obtained using consistent grid resolution and numerical settings across the three models and the two rotor configurations. The computed results are analyzed in terms of the rotor transition maps, separation maps, and surface streamlines on the blade upper and lower surfaces. The agreement with the test data is good, in general, including the rapid, unsteady movement of the transition locations.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CFD Turbulence Transition Models Validation for Rotors in Unsteady Axial and Forward-flight Conditions using CREATETM-AV Helios\",\"authors\":\"R. Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) turbulence transition models are evaluated for rotors in unsteady axial and in forward flight conditions. The study is carried out using CREATETM -AV Helios with NASA codes, Overflow and FUN3D, as the near-body solvers. Three transition models are considered, Amplification Factor Transport (AFT), Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt (LM), and the LM with a crossflow transition model. The LM model is modified to allow for Galilean invariance. The validation study utilizes the data from two recent rotor tests where unsteady transition measurements were obtained on the upper (suction) surface of rotor blades using a novel application of the Differential Infrared Thermography (DIT) technique. The first configuration, the DLR RTG rotor, is a four-blade, 2.13-foot radius rotor in axial flow with pitching blades, operating at Reynolds numbers of 3.2 x 10-5 and 1.7 x 10-5> at three quarter radius, for the two test cases studied. The second configuration, the PSP rotor, is a model-scale, 5.58-foot radius, three-blade rotor in a high-advance-ratio, high-thrust forward flight condition, mounted on a ROBIN-Mod7 fuselage, and operating at a hover Reynolds number of 1.25 x 10-6 at three quarter radius. For this rotor, the validation study also included the DIT measurements on the lower (pressure) surface. Both configurations exhibit large unsteadiness in transition locations. CFD predictions are obtained using consistent grid resolution and numerical settings across the three models and the two rotor configurations. The computed results are analyzed in terms of the rotor transition maps, separation maps, and surface streamlines on the blade upper and lower surfaces. The agreement with the test data is good, in general, including the rapid, unsteady movement of the transition locations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":273020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对旋翼在非定常轴向和前向飞行条件下的湍流转捩模型进行了计算流体力学(CFD)评估。该研究使用CREATETM -AV Helios和NASA代码Overflow和FUN3D作为近体解算器进行。考虑了放大因子输运(AFT)、Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt (LM)和具有横流输运模型的LM三种输运模型。LM模型被修改为允许伽利略不变性。验证研究利用了最近两次转子试验的数据,其中使用差分红外热成像(DIT)技术的新应用,在转子叶片的上(吸力)表面获得了非定常过渡测量。第一种配置是DLR RTG转子,在轴向流动中是一个四叶,半径2.13英尺的转子,带俯伏叶片,在四分之三半径处的雷诺数为3.2 x 10-5和1.7 x 10-5>。第二种配置,PSP旋翼,是一个模型规模的、半径5.58英尺的三叶旋翼,在高推进比、高推力的前飞条件下,安装在ROBIN-Mod7机身上,在四分之三半径处的悬停雷诺数为1.25 x 10-6。对于该转子,验证研究还包括在较低(压力)表面的DIT测量。两种构型在过渡位置都表现出很大的不稳定性。CFD预测是通过三种模型和两种转子配置的一致网格分辨率和数值设置获得的。从转子过渡图、分离图和叶片上下表面流线三个方面对计算结果进行了分析。总的来说,与试验数据吻合较好,包括过渡位置的快速、不稳定运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CFD Turbulence Transition Models Validation for Rotors in Unsteady Axial and Forward-flight Conditions using CREATETM-AV Helios
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) turbulence transition models are evaluated for rotors in unsteady axial and in forward flight conditions. The study is carried out using CREATETM -AV Helios with NASA codes, Overflow and FUN3D, as the near-body solvers. Three transition models are considered, Amplification Factor Transport (AFT), Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt (LM), and the LM with a crossflow transition model. The LM model is modified to allow for Galilean invariance. The validation study utilizes the data from two recent rotor tests where unsteady transition measurements were obtained on the upper (suction) surface of rotor blades using a novel application of the Differential Infrared Thermography (DIT) technique. The first configuration, the DLR RTG rotor, is a four-blade, 2.13-foot radius rotor in axial flow with pitching blades, operating at Reynolds numbers of 3.2 x 10-5 and 1.7 x 10-5> at three quarter radius, for the two test cases studied. The second configuration, the PSP rotor, is a model-scale, 5.58-foot radius, three-blade rotor in a high-advance-ratio, high-thrust forward flight condition, mounted on a ROBIN-Mod7 fuselage, and operating at a hover Reynolds number of 1.25 x 10-6 at three quarter radius. For this rotor, the validation study also included the DIT measurements on the lower (pressure) surface. Both configurations exhibit large unsteadiness in transition locations. CFD predictions are obtained using consistent grid resolution and numerical settings across the three models and the two rotor configurations. The computed results are analyzed in terms of the rotor transition maps, separation maps, and surface streamlines on the blade upper and lower surfaces. The agreement with the test data is good, in general, including the rapid, unsteady movement of the transition locations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信