Agnar Hafliði Andrésson, Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir
{"title":"Er heilsa metin með hlutfallslegum eða algildum hætti","authors":"Agnar Hafliði Andrésson, Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2013.9.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies indicate that individuals care less about relative health status than relative status of other goods. Health, however, is a multidimensional desideratum and the relative characteristics of different dimensions of health have not been studied before. Respondents to a questionnaire had to choose between two different types of social situations: one, where their health was better than the rest of the society’s, and the other, where their health was better than in the previous situation, but everyone else’s health was even better than that, so that their relative standing was worse. Hypothesis tests were used to examine to what extent individuals care about different health dimensions based on their relative status compared to others in the society. The relationship between demographic and health status determinants, and the relative status regarding different dimensions of health was examined using logit regression analysis. The results indicate that few dimensions of health have different relative qualities over others, aside from body weight and infant mortality, which were statistically significantly different. In general, health seems to be considered in absolute terms and individuals do not choose relatively stronger health status at the expense of absolute health.","PeriodicalId":294103,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2013.9.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,个体对相对健康状况的关注程度低于对其他物品相对状况的关注程度。然而,健康是一个多维的需求,以前没有研究过健康不同方面的相对特征。一份问卷的受访者必须在两种不同的社会状况中做出选择:一种是他们的健康状况比社会上其他人的好,另一种是他们的健康状况比以前好,但其他人的健康状况比以前更好,因此他们的相对地位更差。假设检验是用来检验个人在多大程度上关心不同的健康维度基于他们的相对地位,与他人相比,在社会中。使用logit回归分析检验了人口统计学和健康状况决定因素之间的关系,以及不同健康维度的相对状况。结果表明,除了体重和婴儿死亡率在统计上有显著差异外,健康的几个方面的相对质量与其他方面不同。总的来说,健康似乎是绝对的,个人不会以牺牲绝对健康为代价来选择相对较强的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Er heilsa metin með hlutfallslegum eða algildum hætti
Previous studies indicate that individuals care less about relative health status than relative status of other goods. Health, however, is a multidimensional desideratum and the relative characteristics of different dimensions of health have not been studied before. Respondents to a questionnaire had to choose between two different types of social situations: one, where their health was better than the rest of the society’s, and the other, where their health was better than in the previous situation, but everyone else’s health was even better than that, so that their relative standing was worse. Hypothesis tests were used to examine to what extent individuals care about different health dimensions based on their relative status compared to others in the society. The relationship between demographic and health status determinants, and the relative status regarding different dimensions of health was examined using logit regression analysis. The results indicate that few dimensions of health have different relative qualities over others, aside from body weight and infant mortality, which were statistically significantly different. In general, health seems to be considered in absolute terms and individuals do not choose relatively stronger health status at the expense of absolute health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信