决定权?

A. Wellings
{"title":"决定权?","authors":"A. Wellings","doi":"10.5040/9781350080799.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Responding to the long debated controversy over Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), benefits that can result from such legalization, and rights that have the ability to cause such legalization if brought to governments' attention, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":445690,"journal":{"name":"Politics in the Times of Indignation","volume":"513 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right to Decide?\",\"authors\":\"A. Wellings\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781350080799.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Responding to the long debated controversy over Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), benefits that can result from such legalization, and rights that have the ability to cause such legalization if brought to governments' attention, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics in the Times of Indignation\",\"volume\":\"513 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics in the Times of Indignation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350080799.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics in the Times of Indignation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350080799.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对长期以来关于医生协助自杀(PAS)的争论,本文讨论了这种合法化可能带来的好处,以及如果引起政府的注意,有可能导致这种合法化的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right to Decide?
Responding to the long debated controversy over Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), benefits that can result from such legalization, and rights that have the ability to cause such legalization if brought to governments' attention, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信