上颌切除后不同类型闭孔的临床比较。

A Gürbüz, U Hasanreisoğlu
{"title":"上颌切除后不同类型闭孔的临床比较。","authors":"A Gürbüz,&nbsp;U Hasanreisoğlu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigation was carried on eight patients who had undergone partial maxillary resection for the eradication of tumors. Two types of obturators, one being hollow-bulb and the other buccal flange were constructed for each patient, using different impression techniques. When these were compared clinically, it was concluded that buccal flange obturators which were constructed without closed hollow sections were superior to the hollow-bulb obturators with closed nasal sections extending as far as possible into the anterior and lateral aspects of the defect, in comfort, function, speech and stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":77487,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi dergisi = The Journal of the Dental Faculty of Ankara University","volume":"17 1","pages":"103-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical comparison of different types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].\",\"authors\":\"A Gürbüz,&nbsp;U Hasanreisoğlu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This investigation was carried on eight patients who had undergone partial maxillary resection for the eradication of tumors. Two types of obturators, one being hollow-bulb and the other buccal flange were constructed for each patient, using different impression techniques. When these were compared clinically, it was concluded that buccal flange obturators which were constructed without closed hollow sections were superior to the hollow-bulb obturators with closed nasal sections extending as far as possible into the anterior and lateral aspects of the defect, in comfort, function, speech and stabilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi dergisi = The Journal of the Dental Faculty of Ankara University\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"103-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi dergisi = The Journal of the Dental Faculty of Ankara University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi dergisi = The Journal of the Dental Faculty of Ankara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对8例行上颌部分切除术以根除肿瘤的患者进行了调查。采用不同的印模技术,为每位患者构建两种类型的闭孔,一种是空心球,另一种是颊缘。临床比较结果表明,无封闭鼻段的颊缘闭孔在舒适性、功能、言语和稳定性方面优于封闭鼻段的空心球闭孔,且封闭鼻段尽可能延伸到缺损的前部和外侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical comparison of different types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].

This investigation was carried on eight patients who had undergone partial maxillary resection for the eradication of tumors. Two types of obturators, one being hollow-bulb and the other buccal flange were constructed for each patient, using different impression techniques. When these were compared clinically, it was concluded that buccal flange obturators which were constructed without closed hollow sections were superior to the hollow-bulb obturators with closed nasal sections extending as far as possible into the anterior and lateral aspects of the defect, in comfort, function, speech and stabilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信