分级投票管理复制数据的可用性研究

Yuuki Ueda, Hideharu Kojima, Tatsuhiro Tsuchiya
{"title":"分级投票管理复制数据的可用性研究","authors":"Yuuki Ueda, Hideharu Kojima, Tatsuhiro Tsuchiya","doi":"10.1109/ISCC-C.2013.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud services often depend on a mechanism that provides a reliable data storage that is resilient to failures. Majority voting and hierarchical voting, an extension of majority voting, are both used to implement such a mechanism in an unreliable network. For example, Apache ZooKeeper adopts both of the two methods. This work considers the question whether or not hierarchical voting with two levels indeed improves data availability compared to majority voting. The simulation results obtained so far suggest that hierarchical voting is unlikely to increase data availability.","PeriodicalId":313511,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Information Science and Cloud Computing Companion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Availability of Replicated Data Managed by Hierarchical Voting\",\"authors\":\"Yuuki Ueda, Hideharu Kojima, Tatsuhiro Tsuchiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCC-C.2013.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud services often depend on a mechanism that provides a reliable data storage that is resilient to failures. Majority voting and hierarchical voting, an extension of majority voting, are both used to implement such a mechanism in an unreliable network. For example, Apache ZooKeeper adopts both of the two methods. This work considers the question whether or not hierarchical voting with two levels indeed improves data availability compared to majority voting. The simulation results obtained so far suggest that hierarchical voting is unlikely to increase data availability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Information Science and Cloud Computing Companion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Information Science and Cloud Computing Companion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC-C.2013.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Information Science and Cloud Computing Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC-C.2013.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

云服务通常依赖于一种机制,该机制提供可靠的数据存储,能够抵御故障。多数投票和分层投票是多数投票的一种扩展,它们都用于在不可靠的网络中实现这种机制。例如,Apache ZooKeeper采用了这两种方法。这项工作考虑的问题是,与多数投票相比,两级分层投票是否确实提高了数据可用性。目前得到的模拟结果表明,分层投票不太可能增加数据的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Availability of Replicated Data Managed by Hierarchical Voting
Cloud services often depend on a mechanism that provides a reliable data storage that is resilient to failures. Majority voting and hierarchical voting, an extension of majority voting, are both used to implement such a mechanism in an unreliable network. For example, Apache ZooKeeper adopts both of the two methods. This work considers the question whether or not hierarchical voting with two levels indeed improves data availability compared to majority voting. The simulation results obtained so far suggest that hierarchical voting is unlikely to increase data availability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信