两种不同机械作用的电动牙刷的临床比较。

Clinical preventive dentistry Pub Date : 1990-08-01
S G Ciancio, M L Mather
{"title":"两种不同机械作用的电动牙刷的临床比较。","authors":"S G Ciancio,&nbsp;M L Mather","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of plaque removal of the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush and Interplak brush versus the Oral B-40 manual brush. Thirty healthy patients having plaque on all tooth surfaces were admitted for this two-week, double-blind study. Patients served as their own control by brushing manually for one week, and then for a second week with a randomly-assigned electric brush. Three plaque indexes were scored at baseline, one week and two weeks. For all these indexes, results showed that the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush removed significantly more plaque than manual brushing. The Interplak brush removed statistically more plaque than manual brushing only with the Turesky Index. The data for all indexes have a trend toward better plaque scores for patients who used the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush. However, statistical analysis of these scores showed that both electric toothbrushes performed equally well.</p>","PeriodicalId":75715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical preventive dentistry","volume":"12 3","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical comparison of two electric toothbrushes with different mechanical actions.\",\"authors\":\"S G Ciancio,&nbsp;M L Mather\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of plaque removal of the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush and Interplak brush versus the Oral B-40 manual brush. Thirty healthy patients having plaque on all tooth surfaces were admitted for this two-week, double-blind study. Patients served as their own control by brushing manually for one week, and then for a second week with a randomly-assigned electric brush. Three plaque indexes were scored at baseline, one week and two weeks. For all these indexes, results showed that the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush removed significantly more plaque than manual brushing. The Interplak brush removed statistically more plaque than manual brushing only with the Turesky Index. The data for all indexes have a trend toward better plaque scores for patients who used the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush. However, statistical analysis of these scores showed that both electric toothbrushes performed equally well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical preventive dentistry\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"5-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical preventive dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较Water Pik自动牙刷和Interplak牙刷与Oral B-40手动牙刷去除牙菌斑的效果。30名牙齿表面都有牙菌斑的健康患者被纳入这项为期两周的双盲研究。患者作为自己的对照组,用手动刷牙一周,然后用随机分配的电动牙刷进行第二周。在基线、一周和两周时分别对三项斑块指数进行评分。对于所有这些指标,结果表明,Water Pik自动牙刷比手动刷牙去除的牙菌斑明显更多。统计上,Interplak牙刷比仅使用Turesky指数的手动刷牙去除更多的牙菌斑。所有指标的数据都表明,使用Water Pik自动牙刷的患者牙菌斑得分有提高的趋势。然而,对这些分数的统计分析表明,两种电动牙刷的表现一样好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A clinical comparison of two electric toothbrushes with different mechanical actions.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of plaque removal of the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush and Interplak brush versus the Oral B-40 manual brush. Thirty healthy patients having plaque on all tooth surfaces were admitted for this two-week, double-blind study. Patients served as their own control by brushing manually for one week, and then for a second week with a randomly-assigned electric brush. Three plaque indexes were scored at baseline, one week and two weeks. For all these indexes, results showed that the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush removed significantly more plaque than manual brushing. The Interplak brush removed statistically more plaque than manual brushing only with the Turesky Index. The data for all indexes have a trend toward better plaque scores for patients who used the Water Pik Automatic Toothbrush. However, statistical analysis of these scores showed that both electric toothbrushes performed equally well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信