Milan Savić
{"title":"PONIŠTAJ ARBITRAŽNE ODLUKE DONETE OD STRANE AGENCIJE ZA MIRNO REŠAVANjE RADNIH SPOROVA","authors":"Milan Savić","doi":"10.46793/gp.1202.055s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word of the dispute is primarily associated with the intervention of the court. This is a traditional way of resolving labor disputes. The tendency in the world is to get as many of these disputes resolved peacefully, fast and fair manner at low cost. Avoiding court decision increases the chance of finding a favorable solution to the two opposing sides. The content of an arbitration agreement is of great importance to the parties in the arbitration proceedings. An arbitration agreement express the contractual freedom of the parties and list of facultative elements of an arbitration. Main benefits from peaceful solving labor disputes are expediency and cheap costs of the arbitration process. The arbitratior represents quasi – judicial instance and him may be wrong in his decision. The decision process is single and there is no possibility of appeal. This option would slow down the process of resolving issues. But, it can not be situation that would not be any way to void the wrong decision of the arbitratior. It could be chance to avoid this situation. Exactly because of that case, it must be provided for the possibility of annulment decision from peaceful settlment labor disputes agency. Reasons for cancellation must be a procedural character. Courts should not enter into the merits because it would further slow the troubleshooting. This would replicate the slowness of the trial in arbitration deciding. This length of proceedings before the courts is contary to the idea of arbitration as a quick, cheap, efficient and above all peacefull methods of resolving labor disputes. Court in relation to arbitration should have only a supervisory function. Blending the merits of arbitartion decisions would be deprived of independence and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1202.055s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

争议的说法主要与法院的干预有关。这是解决劳资纠纷的传统方式。世界上的趋势是尽可能多地以和平、快速和公平的方式以低成本解决这些争端。避免法院裁决增加了找到对对立双方有利的解决方案的机会。仲裁协议的内容对仲裁的当事人来说是非常重要的。仲裁协议表达了当事人的合同自由和仲裁的可性要素清单。和平解决劳资纠纷的主要好处是仲裁程序的权宜之计和低廉的成本。仲裁员代表准司法案件,他的决定可能是错误的。裁决程序是单一的,没有上诉的可能性。这一选择将减缓解决问题的进程。但是,不能出现任何办法都不能使仲裁庭的错误决定无效的情况。这可能是避免这种情况的机会。正是因为这种情况,必须提供和平解决劳动争议机构撤销决定的可能性。取消的理由必须是程序性的。法院不应介入是非曲实问题,因为这会进一步减缓排除问题的速度。这将重复仲裁裁决过程中审判的缓慢。这种冗长的诉讼程序与仲裁作为一种快速、廉价、高效、尤其是和平解决劳资纠纷的方法的理念背道而驰。法院在仲裁方面应该只具有监督职能。将仲裁决定的优点混合在一起将会丧失独立性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PONIŠTAJ ARBITRAŽNE ODLUKE DONETE OD STRANE AGENCIJE ZA MIRNO REŠAVANjE RADNIH SPOROVA
Word of the dispute is primarily associated with the intervention of the court. This is a traditional way of resolving labor disputes. The tendency in the world is to get as many of these disputes resolved peacefully, fast and fair manner at low cost. Avoiding court decision increases the chance of finding a favorable solution to the two opposing sides. The content of an arbitration agreement is of great importance to the parties in the arbitration proceedings. An arbitration agreement express the contractual freedom of the parties and list of facultative elements of an arbitration. Main benefits from peaceful solving labor disputes are expediency and cheap costs of the arbitration process. The arbitratior represents quasi – judicial instance and him may be wrong in his decision. The decision process is single and there is no possibility of appeal. This option would slow down the process of resolving issues. But, it can not be situation that would not be any way to void the wrong decision of the arbitratior. It could be chance to avoid this situation. Exactly because of that case, it must be provided for the possibility of annulment decision from peaceful settlment labor disputes agency. Reasons for cancellation must be a procedural character. Courts should not enter into the merits because it would further slow the troubleshooting. This would replicate the slowness of the trial in arbitration deciding. This length of proceedings before the courts is contary to the idea of arbitration as a quick, cheap, efficient and above all peacefull methods of resolving labor disputes. Court in relation to arbitration should have only a supervisory function. Blending the merits of arbitartion decisions would be deprived of independence and efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信