市长当代权威的来源:与行政人员角色定位相关的现代政治权威

N. Karsten, S. V. Zuydam
{"title":"市长当代权威的来源:与行政人员角色定位相关的现代政治权威","authors":"N. Karsten, S. V. Zuydam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2489912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political leaders around the world face a general scepticism towards authority. In order to cope with this challenge, new political repertoires and forms of authority are called for. Yet, the sources of contemporary political authority remain underexplored. In this paper the comparative relevance of fourteen authority sources for mayors is studied. It presents the results of a mixed-method study that includes a representative survey of Dutch mayors as well as in-depth interviews and focus groups to relate mayors’ perceptions of available sources of authority to their role orientations. The results show that principle-based and capacity-based authority sources are particularly important for Dutch mayors and challenge the widely shared assumption that the selection procedure is an important source of authority for political leaders. At the same time, other aspects of the mayor’s statutory position, such as his institutional independence and formal responsibilities, have not lost their relevance. Further, our results indicate that the role orientations of mayors to some extent affect the authority sources that they rely upon.","PeriodicalId":385898,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Local Politics & Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sources of Contemporary Authority for Mayors: Pinning Down Modern Political Authority in Relation to Executives’ Role Orientation\",\"authors\":\"N. Karsten, S. V. Zuydam\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2489912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political leaders around the world face a general scepticism towards authority. In order to cope with this challenge, new political repertoires and forms of authority are called for. Yet, the sources of contemporary political authority remain underexplored. In this paper the comparative relevance of fourteen authority sources for mayors is studied. It presents the results of a mixed-method study that includes a representative survey of Dutch mayors as well as in-depth interviews and focus groups to relate mayors’ perceptions of available sources of authority to their role orientations. The results show that principle-based and capacity-based authority sources are particularly important for Dutch mayors and challenge the widely shared assumption that the selection procedure is an important source of authority for political leaders. At the same time, other aspects of the mayor’s statutory position, such as his institutional independence and formal responsibilities, have not lost their relevance. Further, our results indicate that the role orientations of mayors to some extent affect the authority sources that they rely upon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Local Politics & Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Local Politics & Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2489912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Local Politics & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2489912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的政治领导人普遍对权威持怀疑态度。为了应对这一挑战,需要新的政治手段和权威形式。然而,当代政治权威的来源仍未得到充分探索。本文对14种市长权力来源的比较相关性进行了研究。它介绍了一项混合方法研究的结果,其中包括对荷兰市长的代表性调查,以及深入访谈和焦点小组,以将市长对现有权威来源的看法与他们的角色定位联系起来。结果表明,以原则为基础和以能力为基础的权力来源对荷兰市长来说尤为重要,并挑战了人们普遍认为的选举程序是政治领导人重要的权力来源的假设。与此同时,市长法定职位的其他方面,如他的机构独立性和正式职责,并没有失去相关性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,市长的角色取向在一定程度上影响了他们所依赖的权力来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sources of Contemporary Authority for Mayors: Pinning Down Modern Political Authority in Relation to Executives’ Role Orientation
Political leaders around the world face a general scepticism towards authority. In order to cope with this challenge, new political repertoires and forms of authority are called for. Yet, the sources of contemporary political authority remain underexplored. In this paper the comparative relevance of fourteen authority sources for mayors is studied. It presents the results of a mixed-method study that includes a representative survey of Dutch mayors as well as in-depth interviews and focus groups to relate mayors’ perceptions of available sources of authority to their role orientations. The results show that principle-based and capacity-based authority sources are particularly important for Dutch mayors and challenge the widely shared assumption that the selection procedure is an important source of authority for political leaders. At the same time, other aspects of the mayor’s statutory position, such as his institutional independence and formal responsibilities, have not lost their relevance. Further, our results indicate that the role orientations of mayors to some extent affect the authority sources that they rely upon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信