民事诉讼程序改革:一般管辖权的上诉和撤销上诉法院

T. T. Aliev, Anastasia Olegovna Yatsenko, Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Zolotuhin
{"title":"民事诉讼程序改革:一般管辖权的上诉和撤销上诉法院","authors":"T. T. Aliev, Anastasia Olegovna Yatsenko, Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Zolotuhin","doi":"10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-573-580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is devoted to the consideration of the civil procedural legislation reform. The review notes the significance and consequences of two federal laws: Federal Law of November 28, 2018 no. 451-FZ “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” and Federal Law of December 9, 2010 no. 353-FZ “On Amending to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. The study contains two points of view on the content of the changes. The first point of view is presented by T.T. Aliev and A.O. Yatsenko. We point to one of the most important changes in the procedural legislation – a change in the representation institution in court. We propose the creation of a register of persons who have the right to be representatives in court. We also consider the creation of appeal and cassation courts of general jurisdiction. On this aspect of civil procedure reform, special attention is paid in the second point of view presented by A.D. Zolotuhin, who reveals not only the essence of changes, but also notes the historical background, as well as the theoretical characteristics of the changes. Both approaches to the review of the past reform emphasize that the procedural legislation reform meets current needs, but requires careful and consistent implementation.","PeriodicalId":183203,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues of the State and Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil procedure reform: appeal and cassation courts of general jurisdiction\",\"authors\":\"T. T. Aliev, Anastasia Olegovna Yatsenko, Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Zolotuhin\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-573-580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study is devoted to the consideration of the civil procedural legislation reform. The review notes the significance and consequences of two federal laws: Federal Law of November 28, 2018 no. 451-FZ “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” and Federal Law of December 9, 2010 no. 353-FZ “On Amending to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. The study contains two points of view on the content of the changes. The first point of view is presented by T.T. Aliev and A.O. Yatsenko. We point to one of the most important changes in the procedural legislation – a change in the representation institution in court. We propose the creation of a register of persons who have the right to be representatives in court. We also consider the creation of appeal and cassation courts of general jurisdiction. On this aspect of civil procedure reform, special attention is paid in the second point of view presented by A.D. Zolotuhin, who reveals not only the essence of changes, but also notes the historical background, as well as the theoretical characteristics of the changes. Both approaches to the review of the past reform emphasize that the procedural legislation reform meets current needs, but requires careful and consistent implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-573-580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues of the State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-573-580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要是对我国民事诉讼立法改革的思考。审查注意到两项联邦法律的重要性和后果:2018年11月28日第6号联邦法。451-FZ“关于修改俄罗斯联邦某些立法法案”和2010年12月9日第451-FZ号联邦法353-FZ“关于修改俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法”。该研究包含两种观点对内容的变化。第一个观点是由T.T. Aliev和A.O. Yatsenko提出的。我们指出了程序法中最重要的变化之一,即法庭代理机构的变化。我们建议设立一个有权在法庭上担任代表的人的登记册。我们还考虑设立具有一般管辖权的上诉和撤销上诉法院。在民事诉讼制度改革的这一方面,佐洛图金提出的第二种观点得到了特别的关注,他不仅揭示了变革的本质,而且指出了变革的历史背景和理论特征。两种审查过去改革的方法都强调程序法改革符合当前需要,但需要谨慎和一致地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Civil procedure reform: appeal and cassation courts of general jurisdiction
The study is devoted to the consideration of the civil procedural legislation reform. The review notes the significance and consequences of two federal laws: Federal Law of November 28, 2018 no. 451-FZ “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” and Federal Law of December 9, 2010 no. 353-FZ “On Amending to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. The study contains two points of view on the content of the changes. The first point of view is presented by T.T. Aliev and A.O. Yatsenko. We point to one of the most important changes in the procedural legislation – a change in the representation institution in court. We propose the creation of a register of persons who have the right to be representatives in court. We also consider the creation of appeal and cassation courts of general jurisdiction. On this aspect of civil procedure reform, special attention is paid in the second point of view presented by A.D. Zolotuhin, who reveals not only the essence of changes, but also notes the historical background, as well as the theoretical characteristics of the changes. Both approaches to the review of the past reform emphasize that the procedural legislation reform meets current needs, but requires careful and consistent implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信