董事会在批准和解除职务后承担责任

Suwinto Johan, Ariawan Ariawan
{"title":"董事会在批准和解除职务后承担责任","authors":"Suwinto Johan, Ariawan Ariawan","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper objectives to discuss the acquit and discharge of the managing role by directors and supervising role by board of commissioners of the corporation. The research used a sample of the annual general meeting of shareholders of 32 public listed companies and 1 district court decision against the directors of a finance company on charges of falsifying company documents. This research uses judicial normative research method combined empirical data. The results show that the absence of acquit and discharge of directors and board of commissioners regulated in the limited company law, acquit and discharge are not entirely an agenda at the general meeting of shareholders and directors or board of commissioners can still be held for accountable, even though acquit and discharge have been given at the annual general meeting of shareholders.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Setelah Pemberian Acquit and Discharge\",\"authors\":\"Suwinto Johan, Ariawan Ariawan\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper objectives to discuss the acquit and discharge of the managing role by directors and supervising role by board of commissioners of the corporation. The research used a sample of the annual general meeting of shareholders of 32 public listed companies and 1 district court decision against the directors of a finance company on charges of falsifying company documents. This research uses judicial normative research method combined empirical data. The results show that the absence of acquit and discharge of directors and board of commissioners regulated in the limited company law, acquit and discharge are not entirely an agenda at the general meeting of shareholders and directors or board of commissioners can still be held for accountable, even though acquit and discharge have been given at the annual general meeting of shareholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Comitas\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Comitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Comitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在探讨公司董事的管理角色和董事会的监督角色的解除与解除问题。该研究使用了32家上市公司的年度股东大会样本和1个地区法院对一家金融公司董事伪造公司文件指控的判决。本研究采用司法规范研究方法结合实证数据。研究结果表明,在有限公司法律规定的董事和监事免除和解职缺位的情况下,董事和监事免除和解职并不完全是股东大会的议程,即使在年度股东大会上作出了免除和解职的决定,董事或监事仍然可以被问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Setelah Pemberian Acquit and Discharge
This research paper objectives to discuss the acquit and discharge of the managing role by directors and supervising role by board of commissioners of the corporation. The research used a sample of the annual general meeting of shareholders of 32 public listed companies and 1 district court decision against the directors of a finance company on charges of falsifying company documents. This research uses judicial normative research method combined empirical data. The results show that the absence of acquit and discharge of directors and board of commissioners regulated in the limited company law, acquit and discharge are not entirely an agenda at the general meeting of shareholders and directors or board of commissioners can still be held for accountable, even though acquit and discharge have been given at the annual general meeting of shareholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信