澳大利亚医院的质量保证:由谁来做?如何做?

Australian clinical review Pub Date : 1990-01-01

M Renwick, R Harvey

{"title":"澳大利亚医院的质量保证:由谁来做?如何做?","authors":"M Renwick, R Harvey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To seek information on the type, method and extent of quality assurance being undertaken in all public and private hospitals within Australia.Method: Mailed questionnaire.Results: There was a predominance of two types of review being undertaken. Some important deficiencies in the quality assurance process were identified. Far more private than public hospitals reviewed medical records and surveyed patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":77019,"journal":{"name":"Australian clinical review","volume":"10 1","pages":"32-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality assurance in Australian hospitals: who does it and how?\",\"authors\":\"M Renwick, R Harvey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To seek information on the type, method and extent of quality assurance being undertaken in all public and private hospitals within Australia.Method: Mailed questionnaire.Results: There was a predominance of two types of review being undertaken. Some important deficiencies in the quality assurance process were identified. Far more private than public hospitals reviewed medical records and surveyed patient satisfaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian clinical review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"32-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian clinical review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian clinical review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解澳大利亚所有公立和私立医院正在进行的质量保证的类型、方法和程度。方法:邮寄问卷。结果:两种类型的综述占主导地位。在质量保证过程中发现了一些重要的缺陷。私立医院审查病历和调查患者满意度的比例远远高于公立医院。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Quality assurance in Australian hospitals: who does it and how?

Objective: To seek information on the type, method and extent of quality assurance being undertaken in all public and private hospitals within Australia.

Method: Mailed questionnaire.

Results: There was a predominance of two types of review being undertaken. Some important deficiencies in the quality assurance process were identified. Far more private than public hospitals reviewed medical records and surveyed patient satisfaction.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian clinical review

自引率

0.00%

发文量