{"title":"4种牙髓密封胶合剂的理化性质","authors":"P Halimi, J Camps, M Roche, J P Proust","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four endodontic sealers were compared with two series of tests, in thin layer and in 10 mm long and 5 mm diameter rods. Under these conditions, the Pulp Canal Sealer showed the best ability to present a thin layer and the same flow than the Cortisomol. Its setting time was 15 minutes. Forty-eight hours later, the Sealite showed a very good tightness compared to the other sealers. At 30 days, the Pulp Canal Sealer and the OZn-Eugénol were the tightest ones. Less water was absorbed with the Cortisomal and the Sealite. Is there, for these sealers, any correlation between water-absorbtion and tightness?</p>","PeriodicalId":77616,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie","volume":"9 4","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Physico-chemical properties of 4 endodontic sealing cements].\",\"authors\":\"P Halimi, J Camps, M Roche, J P Proust\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Four endodontic sealers were compared with two series of tests, in thin layer and in 10 mm long and 5 mm diameter rods. Under these conditions, the Pulp Canal Sealer showed the best ability to present a thin layer and the same flow than the Cortisomol. Its setting time was 15 minutes. Forty-eight hours later, the Sealite showed a very good tightness compared to the other sealers. At 30 days, the Pulp Canal Sealer and the OZn-Eugénol were the tightest ones. Less water was absorbed with the Cortisomal and the Sealite. Is there, for these sealers, any correlation between water-absorbtion and tightness?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"35-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Physico-chemical properties of 4 endodontic sealing cements].
Four endodontic sealers were compared with two series of tests, in thin layer and in 10 mm long and 5 mm diameter rods. Under these conditions, the Pulp Canal Sealer showed the best ability to present a thin layer and the same flow than the Cortisomol. Its setting time was 15 minutes. Forty-eight hours later, the Sealite showed a very good tightness compared to the other sealers. At 30 days, the Pulp Canal Sealer and the OZn-Eugénol were the tightest ones. Less water was absorbed with the Cortisomal and the Sealite. Is there, for these sealers, any correlation between water-absorbtion and tightness?