新欧洲的政治

Tomasz Fisiak
{"title":"新欧洲的政治","authors":"Tomasz Fisiak","doi":"10.18778/8142-286-4.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"hat’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity was a conference offering a wide range of presentations, with papers exploring subjects as diverse as philosophy, culture and politics. The seven texts in the political part of the ISSEI 2016 proceedings present different epistemic perspectives. The first section entitled “Referendum as a New Tool of Democracy” consists of three texts which focus on direct democracy in the shape of national referenda – in the Baltic States (in Danuta Maj’s article), as well as Hungary and Albania (in the comparative study by Marcin Pomarański), and Belarus (in Wojciech Ziętara’s analysis). What follows is a section “New Politics through the Lens of (Modern) History and Philosophy.” Four articles constituting this part look at politics through the lens of (modern) history and philosophy. S. N. Nyeck examines strategic bargaining in East Africa in the 19th century. Inspired by Deleuze and Habermas, Geoffrey Hinchliffe writes about the society of control and the mechanics of rationalization, while Giorgos Kataliakos dissects the idea of “State anti-cosmopolitanism” in his study of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. Finally, in their collaborative work Richard R. Weiner and Iván López discuss the economic crisis in Spain that led to the formation of the so-called Indignados Movement. All of these contributions tangibly prove that the New Europe faces certain challenges, to which remedies cannot easily be found. However, there is a ray of hope. Dr Gesine Palmer (Zentrum Jüdische Studien Berlin-Brandenburg) aptly summarized the ISSEI 2016 conference by stating that","PeriodicalId":227308,"journal":{"name":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics in the New Europe\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Fisiak\",\"doi\":\"10.18778/8142-286-4.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"hat’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity was a conference offering a wide range of presentations, with papers exploring subjects as diverse as philosophy, culture and politics. The seven texts in the political part of the ISSEI 2016 proceedings present different epistemic perspectives. The first section entitled “Referendum as a New Tool of Democracy” consists of three texts which focus on direct democracy in the shape of national referenda – in the Baltic States (in Danuta Maj’s article), as well as Hungary and Albania (in the comparative study by Marcin Pomarański), and Belarus (in Wojciech Ziętara’s analysis). What follows is a section “New Politics through the Lens of (Modern) History and Philosophy.” Four articles constituting this part look at politics through the lens of (modern) history and philosophy. S. N. Nyeck examines strategic bargaining in East Africa in the 19th century. Inspired by Deleuze and Habermas, Geoffrey Hinchliffe writes about the society of control and the mechanics of rationalization, while Giorgos Kataliakos dissects the idea of “State anti-cosmopolitanism” in his study of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. Finally, in their collaborative work Richard R. Weiner and Iván López discuss the economic crisis in Spain that led to the formation of the so-called Indignados Movement. All of these contributions tangibly prove that the New Europe faces certain challenges, to which remedies cannot easily be found. However, there is a ray of hope. Dr Gesine Palmer (Zentrum Jüdische Studien Berlin-Brandenburg) aptly summarized the ISSEI 2016 conference by stating that\",\"PeriodicalId\":227308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-286-4.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-286-4.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新欧洲的新事物是什么?重新定义文化、政治和身份是一个提供广泛演讲的会议,论文探讨了哲学、文化和政治等不同主题。ISSEI 2016论文集政治部分的七篇文章呈现出不同的认知视角。第一部分题为“全民公决作为一种新的民主工具”,由三篇文章组成,重点讨论全民公决形式的直接民主,分别是波罗的海国家(Danuta Maj的文章)、匈牙利和阿尔巴尼亚(Marcin的比较研究Pomarański)和白俄罗斯(Wojciech Ziętara的分析)。接下来是“(现代)历史和哲学视角下的新政治”一节。组成这一部分的四篇文章通过(现代)历史和哲学的视角来审视政治。S. N.奈克研究了19世纪东非的战略谈判。受德勒兹和哈贝马斯的启发,Geoffrey Hinchliffe撰写了关于控制社会和合理化机制的文章,而Giorgos Kataliakos在他对托马斯·霍布斯的《利维坦》的研究中剖析了“国家反世界主义”的思想。最后,Richard R. Weiner和Iván López在他们的合作作品中讨论了导致所谓的愤怒运动形成的西班牙经济危机。所有这些贡献都切实证明,新欧洲面临着某些挑战,很难找到解决这些挑战的办法。然而,还是有一线希望的。Gesine Palmer博士(柏林-勃兰登堡研究中心)恰当地总结了ISSEI 2016会议,他说
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politics in the New Europe
hat’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity was a conference offering a wide range of presentations, with papers exploring subjects as diverse as philosophy, culture and politics. The seven texts in the political part of the ISSEI 2016 proceedings present different epistemic perspectives. The first section entitled “Referendum as a New Tool of Democracy” consists of three texts which focus on direct democracy in the shape of national referenda – in the Baltic States (in Danuta Maj’s article), as well as Hungary and Albania (in the comparative study by Marcin Pomarański), and Belarus (in Wojciech Ziętara’s analysis). What follows is a section “New Politics through the Lens of (Modern) History and Philosophy.” Four articles constituting this part look at politics through the lens of (modern) history and philosophy. S. N. Nyeck examines strategic bargaining in East Africa in the 19th century. Inspired by Deleuze and Habermas, Geoffrey Hinchliffe writes about the society of control and the mechanics of rationalization, while Giorgos Kataliakos dissects the idea of “State anti-cosmopolitanism” in his study of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. Finally, in their collaborative work Richard R. Weiner and Iván López discuss the economic crisis in Spain that led to the formation of the so-called Indignados Movement. All of these contributions tangibly prove that the New Europe faces certain challenges, to which remedies cannot easily be found. However, there is a ray of hope. Dr Gesine Palmer (Zentrum Jüdische Studien Berlin-Brandenburg) aptly summarized the ISSEI 2016 conference by stating that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信