伊索克拉底与柏拉图:相对主义与唯心主义

Terry M. Perkins
{"title":"伊索克拉底与柏拉图:相对主义与唯心主义","authors":"Terry M. Perkins","doi":"10.1080/10417948409372621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a comparative analysis of the philosophical and rhetorical positions of Isocrates and Plato. Isocrates and his rhetoric have often been referred to, in the pejorative sense, as relativistic. Following the Sophistic tradition of his era, Isocrates does reject the possibility of discovering absolute principles of behavior upon which to conduct human affairs. However, his rhetoric is not opportunistic nor exploitative. Plato's commendation of Isocrates in the Phaedrus suggests that he saw some merit in the program established by Isocrates. Since Plato is a major source of criticism against Sophism and, by extension, Isocrates, a comparison between Isocrates’ relativism and Plato's idealism provides an illuminating insight into the merits of each.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isocrates and Plato: Relativism vs. Idealism\",\"authors\":\"Terry M. Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948409372621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a comparative analysis of the philosophical and rhetorical positions of Isocrates and Plato. Isocrates and his rhetoric have often been referred to, in the pejorative sense, as relativistic. Following the Sophistic tradition of his era, Isocrates does reject the possibility of discovering absolute principles of behavior upon which to conduct human affairs. However, his rhetoric is not opportunistic nor exploitative. Plato's commendation of Isocrates in the Phaedrus suggests that he saw some merit in the program established by Isocrates. Since Plato is a major source of criticism against Sophism and, by extension, Isocrates, a comparison between Isocrates’ relativism and Plato's idealism provides an illuminating insight into the merits of each.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文对伊索克拉底和柏拉图的哲学和修辞立场进行了比较分析。伊索克拉底和他的修辞常常被贬义地称为相对论。遵循他那个时代的诡辩传统,伊索克拉底拒绝了发现绝对的行为原则的可能性,这些原则可以指导人类事务。然而,他的言辞既不是投机取巧,也不是剥削。柏拉图在《费德鲁斯篇》中对伊索克拉底的赞扬表明,他在伊索克拉底建立的纲领中看到了一些优点。由于柏拉图是对诡辩和依索克拉底的批评的主要来源,因此比较依索克拉底的相对主义和柏拉图的唯心主义,可以对各自的优点提供启发性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isocrates and Plato: Relativism vs. Idealism
This paper is a comparative analysis of the philosophical and rhetorical positions of Isocrates and Plato. Isocrates and his rhetoric have often been referred to, in the pejorative sense, as relativistic. Following the Sophistic tradition of his era, Isocrates does reject the possibility of discovering absolute principles of behavior upon which to conduct human affairs. However, his rhetoric is not opportunistic nor exploitative. Plato's commendation of Isocrates in the Phaedrus suggests that he saw some merit in the program established by Isocrates. Since Plato is a major source of criticism against Sophism and, by extension, Isocrates, a comparison between Isocrates’ relativism and Plato's idealism provides an illuminating insight into the merits of each.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信