{"title":"首先阅读的非影响-从这里开始","authors":"Dick Schutz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1368925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The commentary is in three parts: The first part, \"What Went Wrong,\" does not place blame but is intended to clear the way to address the future. The second part, \"What Can Be Salvaged,\" addresses conclusions that can be drawn from the study apart from the reported findings and identifies instrumentation constructed by the Study Team that can be useful in addressing the future. The third part, \"How to Get Impact\" sketches one road map for accomplishing the aspirations of No Child Left Behind.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Non-Impact of Reading First - Where to Go From Here\",\"authors\":\"Dick Schutz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1368925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The commentary is in three parts: The first part, \\\"What Went Wrong,\\\" does not place blame but is intended to clear the way to address the future. The second part, \\\"What Can Be Salvaged,\\\" addresses conclusions that can be drawn from the study apart from the reported findings and identifies instrumentation constructed by the Study Team that can be useful in addressing the future. The third part, \\\"How to Get Impact\\\" sketches one road map for accomplishing the aspirations of No Child Left Behind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1368925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1368925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这篇评论分为三个部分:第一部分“哪里出了问题”(What Went Wrong)并不是指责,而是为未来扫清道路。第二部分,“可以挽救什么”,阐述了除了报告的发现之外,可以从研究中得出的结论,并确定了研究小组构建的可用于解决未来问题的工具。第三部分“如何产生影响”概述了实现“不让一个孩子掉队”目标的路线图。
The Non-Impact of Reading First - Where to Go From Here
The commentary is in three parts: The first part, "What Went Wrong," does not place blame but is intended to clear the way to address the future. The second part, "What Can Be Salvaged," addresses conclusions that can be drawn from the study apart from the reported findings and identifies instrumentation constructed by the Study Team that can be useful in addressing the future. The third part, "How to Get Impact" sketches one road map for accomplishing the aspirations of No Child Left Behind.