综合AHP-TOPSIS评价酒店行业在线营销策略

L. Ocampo, Orlyn Besabella, Marife Fallore, Adelfa Rose Guinandal, Angel Merabueno, Celbert M. Himang, Kafferine D. Yamagishi
{"title":"综合AHP-TOPSIS评价酒店行业在线营销策略","authors":"L. Ocampo, Orlyn Besabella, Marife Fallore, Adelfa Rose Guinandal, Angel Merabueno, Celbert M. Himang, Kafferine D. Yamagishi","doi":"10.4018/IJABIM.20210701.OA11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online marketing has been the most efficient and useful platform for reaching target markets and building customer relations. Despite its widespread use, the hospitality industry is at its forefront of identifying its most suitable online marketing strategies. This emphasis is crucial to strategic marketing and resource allocation decisions, which may impact the long-term performance of businesses. The need to address both perspectives of customers and businesses, along with the multiple online marketing strategies under the presence of multiple criteria, requires a rigorous analytical and comprehensive approach for evaluating the efficacy of these strategies for the hospitality industry. Thus, this work offers an integrated approach based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a decision-making platform for the problem domain. The AHP assigns the corresponding priority weights of the criteria associated with either customers' or businesses' perspectives, while the TOPSIS ranks the importance of the strategies. Results show that the credibility of an online marketing strategy is of the highest priority for the customers, while the businesses highly regard customer loyalty. With the AHP-TOPSIS approach, findings reveal that both perspectives prefer search engines for the hospitality industry. Illustrating the results via a priority tradeoff map of two perspectives, search engines, websites, and blogs are deemed the most viable online marketing strategies relevant to the industry. These findings offer dependable guidelines for the hospitality industry in positioning their online marketing efforts.","PeriodicalId":409651,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag.","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS for Evaluating Online Marketing Strategies for the Hospitality Industry\",\"authors\":\"L. Ocampo, Orlyn Besabella, Marife Fallore, Adelfa Rose Guinandal, Angel Merabueno, Celbert M. Himang, Kafferine D. Yamagishi\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJABIM.20210701.OA11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online marketing has been the most efficient and useful platform for reaching target markets and building customer relations. Despite its widespread use, the hospitality industry is at its forefront of identifying its most suitable online marketing strategies. This emphasis is crucial to strategic marketing and resource allocation decisions, which may impact the long-term performance of businesses. The need to address both perspectives of customers and businesses, along with the multiple online marketing strategies under the presence of multiple criteria, requires a rigorous analytical and comprehensive approach for evaluating the efficacy of these strategies for the hospitality industry. Thus, this work offers an integrated approach based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a decision-making platform for the problem domain. The AHP assigns the corresponding priority weights of the criteria associated with either customers' or businesses' perspectives, while the TOPSIS ranks the importance of the strategies. Results show that the credibility of an online marketing strategy is of the highest priority for the customers, while the businesses highly regard customer loyalty. With the AHP-TOPSIS approach, findings reveal that both perspectives prefer search engines for the hospitality industry. Illustrating the results via a priority tradeoff map of two perspectives, search engines, websites, and blogs are deemed the most viable online marketing strategies relevant to the industry. These findings offer dependable guidelines for the hospitality industry in positioning their online marketing efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag.\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.20210701.OA11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.20210701.OA11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在线营销是达到目标市场和建立客户关系的最有效和最有用的平台。尽管它被广泛使用,但酒店业在确定最合适的在线营销策略方面处于领先地位。这种强调对于战略营销和资源分配决策至关重要,这可能会影响企业的长期绩效。酒店行业需要兼顾客户和企业两方面的需求,以及多种标准下的多种在线营销策略,因此需要采用严格的分析和全面的方法来评估这些策略对酒店行业的效果。因此,这项工作提供了一种基于层次分析法(AHP)和理想解相似性偏好排序技术(TOPSIS)的综合方法,作为问题域的决策平台。AHP分配与客户或企业观点相关的标准的相应优先级权重,而TOPSIS对战略的重要性进行排名。结果显示,网络营销策略的可信度对客户来说是最优先考虑的,而企业则高度重视客户忠诚度。通过AHP-TOPSIS方法,研究结果显示,两种观点都更喜欢酒店行业的搜索引擎。通过两种观点的优先权衡图来说明结果,搜索引擎、网站和博客被认为是与行业相关的最可行的在线营销策略。这些发现为酒店业定位其在线营销工作提供了可靠的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS for Evaluating Online Marketing Strategies for the Hospitality Industry
Online marketing has been the most efficient and useful platform for reaching target markets and building customer relations. Despite its widespread use, the hospitality industry is at its forefront of identifying its most suitable online marketing strategies. This emphasis is crucial to strategic marketing and resource allocation decisions, which may impact the long-term performance of businesses. The need to address both perspectives of customers and businesses, along with the multiple online marketing strategies under the presence of multiple criteria, requires a rigorous analytical and comprehensive approach for evaluating the efficacy of these strategies for the hospitality industry. Thus, this work offers an integrated approach based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a decision-making platform for the problem domain. The AHP assigns the corresponding priority weights of the criteria associated with either customers' or businesses' perspectives, while the TOPSIS ranks the importance of the strategies. Results show that the credibility of an online marketing strategy is of the highest priority for the customers, while the businesses highly regard customer loyalty. With the AHP-TOPSIS approach, findings reveal that both perspectives prefer search engines for the hospitality industry. Illustrating the results via a priority tradeoff map of two perspectives, search engines, websites, and blogs are deemed the most viable online marketing strategies relevant to the industry. These findings offer dependable guidelines for the hospitality industry in positioning their online marketing efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信