{"title":"历史、宗教研究和摩门经研究","authors":"P. Mason","doi":"10.5406/23744774.31.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before the literary scholars, theologians, philosophers, and scripture scholars who currently dominate the field of Book of Mormon studies got their hands on the Book of Mormon, the volume was largely the preserve of historians and religious studies scholars. The same impulses that gave birth to the interdisciplinary field that goes by the name of “Mormon studies” also allowed for serious study of the Book of Mormon to take place within the secular academy.1 Or perhaps it is the reverse—that once scholars began to get comfortable with the notion of taking the Book of Mormon seriously, the conditions were then ripe for the advent of the field of Mormon studies. I’m less interested here in determining whether the chicken or egg came first than in charting the contours of academic inquiry that have allowed for both Mormon studies and Book of Mormon studies to thrive in the twenty-first century. Many have pointed to the 2002 publication of Terryl Givens’s landmark book By the Hand of Mormon as inaugurating this blessed new age of Book of Mormon studies. But without diminishing Givens’s accomplishment or influence, here I consider a number of","PeriodicalId":183152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Book of Mormon Studies","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History, Religious Studies, and Book of Mormon Studies\",\"authors\":\"P. Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/23744774.31.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before the literary scholars, theologians, philosophers, and scripture scholars who currently dominate the field of Book of Mormon studies got their hands on the Book of Mormon, the volume was largely the preserve of historians and religious studies scholars. The same impulses that gave birth to the interdisciplinary field that goes by the name of “Mormon studies” also allowed for serious study of the Book of Mormon to take place within the secular academy.1 Or perhaps it is the reverse—that once scholars began to get comfortable with the notion of taking the Book of Mormon seriously, the conditions were then ripe for the advent of the field of Mormon studies. I’m less interested here in determining whether the chicken or egg came first than in charting the contours of academic inquiry that have allowed for both Mormon studies and Book of Mormon studies to thrive in the twenty-first century. Many have pointed to the 2002 publication of Terryl Givens’s landmark book By the Hand of Mormon as inaugurating this blessed new age of Book of Mormon studies. But without diminishing Givens’s accomplishment or influence, here I consider a number of\",\"PeriodicalId\":183152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Book of Mormon Studies\",\"volume\":\"520 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Book of Mormon Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/23744774.31.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Book of Mormon Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23744774.31.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在文学学者、神学家、哲学家和圣经学者(他们目前主导着《摩门经》的研究领域)接触《摩门经》之前,这本书主要是历史学家和宗教研究学者的领地。同样的冲动产生了跨学科的领域,被称为“摩门教研究”,也允许在世俗的学院中进行对《摩门经》的认真研究或者正好相反——一旦学者们开始接受认真对待《摩门经》的观念,摩门研究领域出现的条件就成熟了。在这里,我对确定是先有鸡还是先有蛋不太感兴趣,我更感兴趣的是绘制学术探究的轮廓,这使得摩门教研究和《摩门经》研究在21世纪蓬勃发展。许多人指出,2002年出版的特丽尔·吉文斯(Terryl Givens)的里程碑式著作《摩门之手》(By the Hand of Mormon)开创了摩门经研究的新时代。但在不贬低吉文斯的成就或影响的情况下,我在这里考虑了一些
History, Religious Studies, and Book of Mormon Studies
Before the literary scholars, theologians, philosophers, and scripture scholars who currently dominate the field of Book of Mormon studies got their hands on the Book of Mormon, the volume was largely the preserve of historians and religious studies scholars. The same impulses that gave birth to the interdisciplinary field that goes by the name of “Mormon studies” also allowed for serious study of the Book of Mormon to take place within the secular academy.1 Or perhaps it is the reverse—that once scholars began to get comfortable with the notion of taking the Book of Mormon seriously, the conditions were then ripe for the advent of the field of Mormon studies. I’m less interested here in determining whether the chicken or egg came first than in charting the contours of academic inquiry that have allowed for both Mormon studies and Book of Mormon studies to thrive in the twenty-first century. Many have pointed to the 2002 publication of Terryl Givens’s landmark book By the Hand of Mormon as inaugurating this blessed new age of Book of Mormon studies. But without diminishing Givens’s accomplishment or influence, here I consider a number of