内镜手术相关案例分析与法律审查

Sung-eun Kim, A-Reum Choe, Kyoung-hee Baek
{"title":"内镜手术相关案例分析与法律审查","authors":"Sung-eun Kim, A-Reum Choe, Kyoung-hee Baek","doi":"10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endoscopic examinations and procedures are widely used to identify and treat digestive-oriented diseases, and are also essential items for the national cancer screening project, making it a familiar and frequently used medical area for the public and patients, and it is a very frequent medical area. \nEndoscopy and treatment play a key role in the prevention and treatment of diseases such as cancer. On the other hand, endoscopy and procedures, which are responsible for preventing and treating diseases, are invasive medical practices, and the risk of adverse consequences such as death and severe disability remains as surgical surgery, but public understanding and awareness may appear differently. In this regard, it is true that medical and legal reviews and approaches have been made to prevent medical accidents related to endoscopic procedures and reduce damage. However, previous studies have focused on considering some cases or cases, and despite their significance, systematic and analytical studies on endoscopic procedures have not been sufficiently conducted, and policy implications from an integrated legal and medical perspective have not been sufficiently derived. \nWhile the general standards and standards of medical practice such as endoscopic procedures are standard, the individual circumstances of the people and patients who are treated are different and difficult to unify. In addition to these individual characteristics of medical behavior, considering the essential characteristics of medical care such as invasion, risk, difficulty in predicting results, and irreversibility, we will derive empirical implications for preventing medical accidents through a specific and comprehensive view of precedents in medical civil litigation for endoscopy. \nTherefore, this paper examines major issues and results of various civil cases related to endoscopy procedures in various ways, and suggests measures to prevent medical accidents and guarantee patients' treatment options to improve national health and reduce disputes.","PeriodicalId":398961,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and Legal Review of Cases Related to Endoscopic Procedures\",\"authors\":\"Sung-eun Kim, A-Reum Choe, Kyoung-hee Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endoscopic examinations and procedures are widely used to identify and treat digestive-oriented diseases, and are also essential items for the national cancer screening project, making it a familiar and frequently used medical area for the public and patients, and it is a very frequent medical area. \\nEndoscopy and treatment play a key role in the prevention and treatment of diseases such as cancer. On the other hand, endoscopy and procedures, which are responsible for preventing and treating diseases, are invasive medical practices, and the risk of adverse consequences such as death and severe disability remains as surgical surgery, but public understanding and awareness may appear differently. In this regard, it is true that medical and legal reviews and approaches have been made to prevent medical accidents related to endoscopic procedures and reduce damage. However, previous studies have focused on considering some cases or cases, and despite their significance, systematic and analytical studies on endoscopic procedures have not been sufficiently conducted, and policy implications from an integrated legal and medical perspective have not been sufficiently derived. \\nWhile the general standards and standards of medical practice such as endoscopic procedures are standard, the individual circumstances of the people and patients who are treated are different and difficult to unify. In addition to these individual characteristics of medical behavior, considering the essential characteristics of medical care such as invasion, risk, difficulty in predicting results, and irreversibility, we will derive empirical implications for preventing medical accidents through a specific and comprehensive view of precedents in medical civil litigation for endoscopy. \\nTherefore, this paper examines major issues and results of various civil cases related to endoscopy procedures in various ways, and suggests measures to prevent medical accidents and guarantee patients' treatment options to improve national health and reduce disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"volume\":\"227 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜检查和手术被广泛应用于消化道疾病的识别和治疗,也是国家癌症筛查项目的必备项目,是公众和患者熟悉和经常使用的医疗领域,是一个非常频繁的医疗领域。内镜检查和治疗在癌症等疾病的预防和治疗中起着关键作用。另一方面,负责预防和治疗疾病的内窥镜检查和手术是侵入性的医疗做法,造成死亡和严重残疾等不良后果的风险仍然是外科手术,但公众的理解和认识可能有所不同。在这方面,确实已经进行了医疗和法律审查和办法,以防止与内窥镜手术有关的医疗事故并减少损害。然而,以往的研究侧重于考虑一些或一些病例,尽管其意义重大,但对内窥镜手术的系统和分析研究尚未充分开展,从法律和医学的综合角度未能充分推导出政策含义。虽然内窥镜手术等医疗实践的一般标准和标准是标准的,但接受治疗的人和患者的个人情况是不同的,难以统一。除了这些医疗行为的个体特征外,考虑到医疗服务的侵入性、风险性、结果难以预测、不可逆性等本质特征,我们将通过对内窥镜医疗民事诉讼案例的具体和全面的分析,得出预防医疗事故的经验启示。因此,本文以不同的方式对各类与内镜手术相关的民事案件的主要问题和结果进行梳理,提出预防医疗事故、保障患者治疗选择的措施,以提高国民健康水平,减少纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis and Legal Review of Cases Related to Endoscopic Procedures
Endoscopic examinations and procedures are widely used to identify and treat digestive-oriented diseases, and are also essential items for the national cancer screening project, making it a familiar and frequently used medical area for the public and patients, and it is a very frequent medical area. Endoscopy and treatment play a key role in the prevention and treatment of diseases such as cancer. On the other hand, endoscopy and procedures, which are responsible for preventing and treating diseases, are invasive medical practices, and the risk of adverse consequences such as death and severe disability remains as surgical surgery, but public understanding and awareness may appear differently. In this regard, it is true that medical and legal reviews and approaches have been made to prevent medical accidents related to endoscopic procedures and reduce damage. However, previous studies have focused on considering some cases or cases, and despite their significance, systematic and analytical studies on endoscopic procedures have not been sufficiently conducted, and policy implications from an integrated legal and medical perspective have not been sufficiently derived. While the general standards and standards of medical practice such as endoscopic procedures are standard, the individual circumstances of the people and patients who are treated are different and difficult to unify. In addition to these individual characteristics of medical behavior, considering the essential characteristics of medical care such as invasion, risk, difficulty in predicting results, and irreversibility, we will derive empirical implications for preventing medical accidents through a specific and comprehensive view of precedents in medical civil litigation for endoscopy. Therefore, this paper examines major issues and results of various civil cases related to endoscopy procedures in various ways, and suggests measures to prevent medical accidents and guarantee patients' treatment options to improve national health and reduce disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信