打字错误的Smörgåsbord:探索国际键盘布局排字

V. Pochat, Tom van Goethem, W. Joosen
{"title":"打字错误的Smörgåsbord:探索国际键盘布局排字","authors":"V. Pochat, Tom van Goethem, W. Joosen","doi":"10.1109/SPW.2019.00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typosquatting is the malicious practice of registering domains that result from typos made when users try to visit popular domains. Previous works have only considered the US English keyboard layout, but of course other layouts are widely used around the world. In this paper, we uncover how typosquatters are also targeting communities that use these other layouts by examining typo domains on non-US English keyboards for 100 000 popular domains. We find that German users are the most targeted, with over 15 000 registered typo domains. Companies such as Equifax and Amazon have defensively registered such domains but are often incomplete; moreover, other major companies ignore them altogether and allow malicious actors to capitalize on their brand. Parking domains or advertising them for sale remains the most popular monetization strategy of squatters on at least 40% of registered domains, but we also see more harmful practices, such as a scam website that spoofs a local newspaper. This proves that domain squatters also consider typos on non-US English keyboards to be valuable, and that companies should be more alert in claiming these domains.","PeriodicalId":125351,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Smörgåsbord of Typos: Exploring International Keyboard Layout Typosquatting\",\"authors\":\"V. Pochat, Tom van Goethem, W. Joosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPW.2019.00043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typosquatting is the malicious practice of registering domains that result from typos made when users try to visit popular domains. Previous works have only considered the US English keyboard layout, but of course other layouts are widely used around the world. In this paper, we uncover how typosquatters are also targeting communities that use these other layouts by examining typo domains on non-US English keyboards for 100 000 popular domains. We find that German users are the most targeted, with over 15 000 registered typo domains. Companies such as Equifax and Amazon have defensively registered such domains but are often incomplete; moreover, other major companies ignore them altogether and allow malicious actors to capitalize on their brand. Parking domains or advertising them for sale remains the most popular monetization strategy of squatters on at least 40% of registered domains, but we also see more harmful practices, such as a scam website that spoofs a local newspaper. This proves that domain squatters also consider typos on non-US English keyboards to be valuable, and that companies should be more alert in claiming these domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2019.00043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2019.00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

typposquatting是一种恶意注册域名的行为,这种行为是由于用户试图访问热门域名时出现的拼写错误而导致的。以前的作品只考虑了美式英语键盘布局,当然其他布局在世界各地都被广泛使用。在本文中,我们发现typposquatters如何通过检查非美国英语键盘上的10万个流行域名的typo域来瞄准使用这些其他布局的社区。我们发现德国用户是最有针对性的,有超过15000个注册的typo域名。Equifax和亚马逊等公司已经防御性地注册了这类域名,但往往不完整;此外,其他大公司完全忽略了它们,并允许恶意行为者利用它们的品牌。在至少40%的已注册域名中,停放域名或打广告出售域名仍然是抢注者最流行的盈利策略,但我们也看到了更多有害的做法,比如一个欺骗当地报纸的诈骗网站。这证明,域名抢注者也认为非美国英语键盘上的错别字很有价值,企业在申请这些域名时应更加警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Smörgåsbord of Typos: Exploring International Keyboard Layout Typosquatting
Typosquatting is the malicious practice of registering domains that result from typos made when users try to visit popular domains. Previous works have only considered the US English keyboard layout, but of course other layouts are widely used around the world. In this paper, we uncover how typosquatters are also targeting communities that use these other layouts by examining typo domains on non-US English keyboards for 100 000 popular domains. We find that German users are the most targeted, with over 15 000 registered typo domains. Companies such as Equifax and Amazon have defensively registered such domains but are often incomplete; moreover, other major companies ignore them altogether and allow malicious actors to capitalize on their brand. Parking domains or advertising them for sale remains the most popular monetization strategy of squatters on at least 40% of registered domains, but we also see more harmful practices, such as a scam website that spoofs a local newspaper. This proves that domain squatters also consider typos on non-US English keyboards to be valuable, and that companies should be more alert in claiming these domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信