{"title":"WPS和女权主义:实证主义、军事独裁和革命者","authors":"Taher Benany","doi":"10.54729/pcyr7730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The women, peace, and security (WPS) agenda is considered by many a feminist international agenda. This note argues that the contrary. This note will attempt to argue that the WPS agenda may in fact undermine the global international law feminist movement as opposed to furthering it. The view in this article is that WPS agenda is in fact a human rights positive law carve out dressed as a feminist carve out.","PeriodicalId":408531,"journal":{"name":"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WPS AND FEMINISM: POSITIVISM, MILITARY DICTATORSHIPS, AND REVOLUTIONARIES\",\"authors\":\"Taher Benany\",\"doi\":\"10.54729/pcyr7730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The women, peace, and security (WPS) agenda is considered by many a feminist international agenda. This note argues that the contrary. This note will attempt to argue that the WPS agenda may in fact undermine the global international law feminist movement as opposed to furthering it. The view in this article is that WPS agenda is in fact a human rights positive law carve out dressed as a feminist carve out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54729/pcyr7730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54729/pcyr7730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
WPS AND FEMINISM: POSITIVISM, MILITARY DICTATORSHIPS, AND REVOLUTIONARIES
The women, peace, and security (WPS) agenda is considered by many a feminist international agenda. This note argues that the contrary. This note will attempt to argue that the WPS agenda may in fact undermine the global international law feminist movement as opposed to furthering it. The view in this article is that WPS agenda is in fact a human rights positive law carve out dressed as a feminist carve out.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
