马来西亚房地产投资信托基金的债务与财务绩效:财务灵活性的调节效应。

Zalina Zainudin, Izani Ibrahim, Rasidah Mohamad Said, H. I. Hussain
{"title":"马来西亚房地产投资信托基金的债务与财务绩效:财务灵活性的调节效应。","authors":"Zalina Zainudin, Izani Ibrahim, Rasidah Mohamad Said, H. I. Hussain","doi":"10.17576/PENGURUSAN-2017-50-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curiosity in bank debt financing decision was primarily inspired by the perceptible contradiction between the REITs’ unique operational business structure particularly REITs in Malaysia (M-REITs) and the finance theory of capital structure decision. The Trade Off Theory implies that the financing strategy of using debt provides no value in REITs entity with a marginal tax rate of zero.  The use of debt by REITs entity is seen to be a puzzle in numerous REITs literature as REITs do not have tax shield benefit of using debt. High dividend payout requirement constraints REITs ability to retain its internal earnings and have to use debt to undertake growth strategies. The moderating effect of financial flexibility in a relationship between bank debt financing and the financial performance are examined and presents new empirical evidence on the role of the financial flexibility. The study offers some important insights into the debt financing decision for M-REITs. Using the unbalanced panel data from all M-REITs for the period from 2005 to 2014, this study reveals that size has strong positive relationship with debt financing, smaller M-REITs prefer to use short term debt, diversified M-REITs is found to have lower debt as compared to focused M-REITs, growth in investment and liquidity has positive relationship with bank debt financing while internal cash constraints and cash flow volatility has a negative relationship with debt financing.  The results of this study indicate that both Pecking Order Theory and Trade Off Theory complements each other in explaining the M-REITs debt financing decision and less supportive for Agency Theory. This suggests that the use of debt as a disciplinary tool seems to be less crucial for M-REITs entity with high mandated dividend payout requirement. Indeed, the high payout requirement behaves as a “disciplinary tool” in M-REITs. The results on the relationship between debt and financial performance reveal that both short term and long term debt are negatively related to financial performance,  liquidity is found to be an important factor on M-REITs’ financial performance and size have no relation with financial performance. Financial flexibility positively moderates the relationship between debt and financial performance. The findings retrieved from this study serve as a useful guide to M-REITs’ managers to manage the financial flexibility as it has important moderating effects on debt and financial performance relationship.","PeriodicalId":311489,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengurusan UKM Journal of Management","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debt and Financial Performance of Reits In Malaysia: A Moderating Effect of Financial Flexibility.\",\"authors\":\"Zalina Zainudin, Izani Ibrahim, Rasidah Mohamad Said, H. I. Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/PENGURUSAN-2017-50-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Curiosity in bank debt financing decision was primarily inspired by the perceptible contradiction between the REITs’ unique operational business structure particularly REITs in Malaysia (M-REITs) and the finance theory of capital structure decision. The Trade Off Theory implies that the financing strategy of using debt provides no value in REITs entity with a marginal tax rate of zero.  The use of debt by REITs entity is seen to be a puzzle in numerous REITs literature as REITs do not have tax shield benefit of using debt. High dividend payout requirement constraints REITs ability to retain its internal earnings and have to use debt to undertake growth strategies. The moderating effect of financial flexibility in a relationship between bank debt financing and the financial performance are examined and presents new empirical evidence on the role of the financial flexibility. The study offers some important insights into the debt financing decision for M-REITs. Using the unbalanced panel data from all M-REITs for the period from 2005 to 2014, this study reveals that size has strong positive relationship with debt financing, smaller M-REITs prefer to use short term debt, diversified M-REITs is found to have lower debt as compared to focused M-REITs, growth in investment and liquidity has positive relationship with bank debt financing while internal cash constraints and cash flow volatility has a negative relationship with debt financing.  The results of this study indicate that both Pecking Order Theory and Trade Off Theory complements each other in explaining the M-REITs debt financing decision and less supportive for Agency Theory. This suggests that the use of debt as a disciplinary tool seems to be less crucial for M-REITs entity with high mandated dividend payout requirement. Indeed, the high payout requirement behaves as a “disciplinary tool” in M-REITs. The results on the relationship between debt and financial performance reveal that both short term and long term debt are negatively related to financial performance,  liquidity is found to be an important factor on M-REITs’ financial performance and size have no relation with financial performance. Financial flexibility positively moderates the relationship between debt and financial performance. The findings retrieved from this study serve as a useful guide to M-REITs’ managers to manage the financial flexibility as it has important moderating effects on debt and financial performance relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pengurusan UKM Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pengurusan UKM Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/PENGURUSAN-2017-50-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengurusan UKM Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/PENGURUSAN-2017-50-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

人们对银行债务融资决策的好奇,主要是由于REITs独特的经营业务结构,特别是马来西亚REITs (M-REITs)与资本结构决策的金融理论之间存在明显的矛盾。权衡理论表明,在边际税率为零的REITs实体中,使用债务的融资策略没有价值。REITs实体对债务的使用在许多REITs文献中被视为一个谜,因为REITs没有使用债务的税盾利益。高股息支付要求限制了房地产投资信托基金保留其内部收益的能力,并不得不利用债务来实施增长战略。研究了财务灵活性在银行债务融资与财务绩效关系中的调节作用,为财务灵活性的作用提供了新的实证证据。该研究为M-REITs的债务融资决策提供了一些重要的见解。利用2005 - 2014年所有M-REITs的不平衡面板数据,本研究发现,规模与债务融资有很强的正相关关系,较小的M-REITs更倾向于使用短期债务,多元化的M-REITs的债务比集中的M-REITs低,投资增长和流动性与银行债务融资呈正相关,而内部现金约束和现金流波动与债务融资呈负相关。研究结果表明,在解释M-REITs债务融资决策时,啄序理论与权衡理论是互补的,对代理理论的支持度较低。这表明,对于具有高强制股息支付要求的M-REITs实体而言,使用债务作为纪律工具似乎不那么重要。事实上,高支付要求在M-REITs中起到了“纪律工具”的作用。债务与财务绩效关系的研究结果显示,短期和长期债务与财务绩效均呈负相关,流动性是影响M-REITs财务绩效的重要因素,规模与财务绩效无关。财务灵活性正向调节债务与财务绩效之间的关系。本研究的结果为M-REITs管理者管理财务灵活性提供了有益的指导,因为它对债务和财务绩效关系具有重要的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debt and Financial Performance of Reits In Malaysia: A Moderating Effect of Financial Flexibility.
Curiosity in bank debt financing decision was primarily inspired by the perceptible contradiction between the REITs’ unique operational business structure particularly REITs in Malaysia (M-REITs) and the finance theory of capital structure decision. The Trade Off Theory implies that the financing strategy of using debt provides no value in REITs entity with a marginal tax rate of zero.  The use of debt by REITs entity is seen to be a puzzle in numerous REITs literature as REITs do not have tax shield benefit of using debt. High dividend payout requirement constraints REITs ability to retain its internal earnings and have to use debt to undertake growth strategies. The moderating effect of financial flexibility in a relationship between bank debt financing and the financial performance are examined and presents new empirical evidence on the role of the financial flexibility. The study offers some important insights into the debt financing decision for M-REITs. Using the unbalanced panel data from all M-REITs for the period from 2005 to 2014, this study reveals that size has strong positive relationship with debt financing, smaller M-REITs prefer to use short term debt, diversified M-REITs is found to have lower debt as compared to focused M-REITs, growth in investment and liquidity has positive relationship with bank debt financing while internal cash constraints and cash flow volatility has a negative relationship with debt financing.  The results of this study indicate that both Pecking Order Theory and Trade Off Theory complements each other in explaining the M-REITs debt financing decision and less supportive for Agency Theory. This suggests that the use of debt as a disciplinary tool seems to be less crucial for M-REITs entity with high mandated dividend payout requirement. Indeed, the high payout requirement behaves as a “disciplinary tool” in M-REITs. The results on the relationship between debt and financial performance reveal that both short term and long term debt are negatively related to financial performance,  liquidity is found to be an important factor on M-REITs’ financial performance and size have no relation with financial performance. Financial flexibility positively moderates the relationship between debt and financial performance. The findings retrieved from this study serve as a useful guide to M-REITs’ managers to manage the financial flexibility as it has important moderating effects on debt and financial performance relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信