宪法保护与差异动态

N. Saito
{"title":"宪法保护与差异动态","authors":"N. Saito","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9780814723944.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In American law and culture, the presumption is that the Constitution’s guarantees of due process and equal protection will effectively rid society of racial discrimination. In fact, however, the “dynamic of difference” inherent to all colonial relations persists. This chapter considers how the plenary power doctrine, equal protection jurisprudence, and the presumptive goal of assimilation into the dominant society all contribute to the maintenance of structural racism.","PeriodicalId":147008,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonialism, Race, and the Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Protection and the Dynamic of Difference\",\"authors\":\"N. Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.18574/nyu/9780814723944.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In American law and culture, the presumption is that the Constitution’s guarantees of due process and equal protection will effectively rid society of racial discrimination. In fact, however, the “dynamic of difference” inherent to all colonial relations persists. This chapter considers how the plenary power doctrine, equal protection jurisprudence, and the presumptive goal of assimilation into the dominant society all contribute to the maintenance of structural racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Settler Colonialism, Race, and the Law\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Settler Colonialism, Race, and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814723944.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Settler Colonialism, Race, and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814723944.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国法律和文化中,人们的假设是,宪法对正当程序和平等保护的保障将有效地消除社会上的种族歧视。然而,事实上,所有殖民关系所固有的“差异动力”仍然存在。本章探讨了权力至上主义、平等保护法理学以及融入主流社会的假定目标是如何促成了结构性种族主义的维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitutional Protection and the Dynamic of Difference
In American law and culture, the presumption is that the Constitution’s guarantees of due process and equal protection will effectively rid society of racial discrimination. In fact, however, the “dynamic of difference” inherent to all colonial relations persists. This chapter considers how the plenary power doctrine, equal protection jurisprudence, and the presumptive goal of assimilation into the dominant society all contribute to the maintenance of structural racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信