自治还是他律——GDPR第6条的双层解释建议

Andreas Sattler
{"title":"自治还是他律——GDPR第6条的双层解释建议","authors":"Andreas Sattler","doi":"10.5771/9783748908531-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, there is an almost ideological conflict between proponents and opponents of rigid data protection. One side emphasizes that privacy is rooted in human dignity and is therefore sacrosanct. The other side, principally enterprises, search for correlations in huge sets of data thus exploiting the semantic level of personal data to increase knowledge. The business models of powerful platforms and the current legal framework illustrates this conflict between economic reality and the legal framework. This article suggests an interpretation of Art. 6 GDPR that reconciles economic reality with the European law on privacy.","PeriodicalId":106787,"journal":{"name":"Data as Counter-Performance - Contract Law 2.0?","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomy or Heteronomy – Proposal for a Two-Tier Interpretation of Art 6 GDPR\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Sattler\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748908531-225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, there is an almost ideological conflict between proponents and opponents of rigid data protection. One side emphasizes that privacy is rooted in human dignity and is therefore sacrosanct. The other side, principally enterprises, search for correlations in huge sets of data thus exploiting the semantic level of personal data to increase knowledge. The business models of powerful platforms and the current legal framework illustrates this conflict between economic reality and the legal framework. This article suggests an interpretation of Art. 6 GDPR that reconciles economic reality with the European law on privacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data as Counter-Performance - Contract Law 2.0?\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data as Counter-Performance - Contract Law 2.0?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748908531-225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data as Counter-Performance - Contract Law 2.0?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748908531-225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,严格数据保护的支持者和反对者之间几乎存在意识形态上的冲突。一方强调隐私植根于人的尊严,因此是神圣不可侵犯的。另一方,主要是企业,在庞大的数据集中搜索相关性,从而利用个人数据的语义层次来增加知识。强大平台的商业模式和现行法律框架说明了这种经济现实与法律框架之间的冲突。本文建议对GDPR第6条进行解释,使经济现实与欧洲隐私法相协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autonomy or Heteronomy – Proposal for a Two-Tier Interpretation of Art 6 GDPR
Currently, there is an almost ideological conflict between proponents and opponents of rigid data protection. One side emphasizes that privacy is rooted in human dignity and is therefore sacrosanct. The other side, principally enterprises, search for correlations in huge sets of data thus exploiting the semantic level of personal data to increase knowledge. The business models of powerful platforms and the current legal framework illustrates this conflict between economic reality and the legal framework. This article suggests an interpretation of Art. 6 GDPR that reconciles economic reality with the European law on privacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信