难民外交的现实:欧盟-土耳其协议和合法化的政治叙事

Maria Kristine Kolding Andersen, V. Ferretti, Kristine Fjelde Heimstad, Mads Andreas Ibberskov Rødvig
{"title":"难民外交的现实:欧盟-土耳其协议和合法化的政治叙事","authors":"Maria Kristine Kolding Andersen, V. Ferretti, Kristine Fjelde Heimstad, Mads Andreas Ibberskov Rødvig","doi":"10.5278/OJS.IJIS.V10I1.6353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU-Turkey Statement was introduced in March 2016 as a solution to the ongoing Syrian refugee crisis, with the aim of limiting irregular migration to Europe and securing the EU’s external borders. As an act of externalization of the European border and migration control, the agreement has been regarded as controversial. This paper attempts to answer how the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed in the political discourse as an attempt to legitimize the externalization of European border and migration management to a ‘safe third country’. The research question will be addressed through document and discourse analysis, and with the analytical lenses of humanitarianization, securitization and externalization of the Statement, its evaluations, and the political discourses surrounding it. In summary, the result of this analysis shows that the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed as a humanitarian and security crisis in order to justify a questionable externalization policy.","PeriodicalId":330787,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of international studies","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reality of Refugee Diplomacy: EU-Turkey agreement and political narratives of legitimization\",\"authors\":\"Maria Kristine Kolding Andersen, V. Ferretti, Kristine Fjelde Heimstad, Mads Andreas Ibberskov Rødvig\",\"doi\":\"10.5278/OJS.IJIS.V10I1.6353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The EU-Turkey Statement was introduced in March 2016 as a solution to the ongoing Syrian refugee crisis, with the aim of limiting irregular migration to Europe and securing the EU’s external borders. As an act of externalization of the European border and migration control, the agreement has been regarded as controversial. This paper attempts to answer how the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed in the political discourse as an attempt to legitimize the externalization of European border and migration management to a ‘safe third country’. The research question will be addressed through document and discourse analysis, and with the analytical lenses of humanitarianization, securitization and externalization of the Statement, its evaluations, and the political discourses surrounding it. In summary, the result of this analysis shows that the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed as a humanitarian and security crisis in order to justify a questionable externalization policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of international studies\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of international studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.IJIS.V10I1.6353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of international studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.IJIS.V10I1.6353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧盟-土耳其声明于2016年3月发布,旨在解决持续的叙利亚难民危机,旨在限制向欧洲的非正常移民,并确保欧盟外部边界的安全。作为欧洲边境和移民控制的外部化行为,该协议一直被认为是有争议的。本文试图回答欧盟-土耳其声明如何在政治话语中被框定为试图将欧洲边境和移民管理外部化合法化到“安全的第三国”。研究问题将通过文件和话语分析,并与人道主义化,证券化和外化的声明,其评估和围绕它的政治话语的分析镜头来解决。总之,这一分析的结果表明,欧盟-土耳其声明被说成是一场人道主义和安全危机,以便为一项有问题的外部化政策辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Reality of Refugee Diplomacy: EU-Turkey agreement and political narratives of legitimization
The EU-Turkey Statement was introduced in March 2016 as a solution to the ongoing Syrian refugee crisis, with the aim of limiting irregular migration to Europe and securing the EU’s external borders. As an act of externalization of the European border and migration control, the agreement has been regarded as controversial. This paper attempts to answer how the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed in the political discourse as an attempt to legitimize the externalization of European border and migration management to a ‘safe third country’. The research question will be addressed through document and discourse analysis, and with the analytical lenses of humanitarianization, securitization and externalization of the Statement, its evaluations, and the political discourses surrounding it. In summary, the result of this analysis shows that the EU-Turkey Statement has been framed as a humanitarian and security crisis in order to justify a questionable externalization policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信