工作论文系列:哲学与知识:对柔性管理方法的反思。

M. Fascia
{"title":"工作论文系列:哲学与知识:对柔性管理方法的反思。","authors":"M. Fascia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3337115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a businesscontext and deliberate a contrary philosophical perspective which does notconform to prevailing knowledge theory. We consider why, if knowledge iskey for business success and competitive advantage, the transfer ofknowledge within an organisation remains problematic. Whereby, if thecreation of knowledge before transfer is recognised is a significant factor indetermining a starting point for analogous scrutiny, then what makes thisfocal point so difficult to establish and measure?We therefore consider parallelism between agents who believe propositionsand the formal system that derives proposition. In doing so, we synthesisefrom current literature and research, the epistemic principal of ‘knowledge’,which underpins the understanding of the many congruent knowledgetransfer theories, in a business context. To do this we reflect on Lindströmand the epistemic states of Spohn, wherein, we can draw on descriptions ofconditional doxastic maps, as a natural extension of contemporary Kripkemodels. We conclude the epistemic principle of ‘knowledge’, whichunderpins the plausibility of comparisons between epistemicallydistinguishable knowledge transfer, must include perspectives and doyennesfrom a recognisable, not implied, value standpoint","PeriodicalId":305845,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Management & Strategy Practice (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working Paper Series: Philosophy and Knowledge: Reflexion on a Flexible Management Method.\",\"authors\":\"M. Fascia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3337115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a businesscontext and deliberate a contrary philosophical perspective which does notconform to prevailing knowledge theory. We consider why, if knowledge iskey for business success and competitive advantage, the transfer ofknowledge within an organisation remains problematic. Whereby, if thecreation of knowledge before transfer is recognised is a significant factor indetermining a starting point for analogous scrutiny, then what makes thisfocal point so difficult to establish and measure?We therefore consider parallelism between agents who believe propositionsand the formal system that derives proposition. In doing so, we synthesisefrom current literature and research, the epistemic principal of ‘knowledge’,which underpins the understanding of the many congruent knowledgetransfer theories, in a business context. To do this we reflect on Lindströmand the epistemic states of Spohn, wherein, we can draw on descriptions ofconditional doxastic maps, as a natural extension of contemporary Kripkemodels. We conclude the epistemic principle of ‘knowledge’, whichunderpins the plausibility of comparisons between epistemicallydistinguishable knowledge transfer, must include perspectives and doyennesfrom a recognisable, not implied, value standpoint\",\"PeriodicalId\":305845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Management & Strategy Practice (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Management & Strategy Practice (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Management & Strategy Practice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这次讨论中,我们反思了知识在商业环境中的价值,并深思熟虑了一个与主流知识理论不一致的相反的哲学观点。如果知识是商业成功和竞争优势的关键,那么为什么组织内部的知识转移仍然存在问题。因此,如果认识到转移之前的知识创造是决定类似审查起点的一个重要因素,那么是什么使这个焦点如此难以建立和衡量?因此,我们考虑相信命题的主体和派生命题的形式系统之间的并行性。在此过程中,我们从当前的文献和研究中综合了“知识”的认识论原则,这是对商业环境中许多一致知识转移理论的理解的基础。为了做到这一点,我们反思Lindströmand Spohn的认知状态,其中,我们可以利用条件随机映射的描述,作为当代kripkkmodel的自然延伸。我们总结了“知识”的认识论原则,它支撑了认识论上可区分的知识转移之间比较的合理性,必须包括来自可识别的,而不是隐含的价值立场的观点和实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working Paper Series: Philosophy and Knowledge: Reflexion on a Flexible Management Method.
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a businesscontext and deliberate a contrary philosophical perspective which does notconform to prevailing knowledge theory. We consider why, if knowledge iskey for business success and competitive advantage, the transfer ofknowledge within an organisation remains problematic. Whereby, if thecreation of knowledge before transfer is recognised is a significant factor indetermining a starting point for analogous scrutiny, then what makes thisfocal point so difficult to establish and measure?We therefore consider parallelism between agents who believe propositionsand the formal system that derives proposition. In doing so, we synthesisefrom current literature and research, the epistemic principal of ‘knowledge’,which underpins the understanding of the many congruent knowledgetransfer theories, in a business context. To do this we reflect on Lindströmand the epistemic states of Spohn, wherein, we can draw on descriptions ofconditional doxastic maps, as a natural extension of contemporary Kripkemodels. We conclude the epistemic principle of ‘knowledge’, whichunderpins the plausibility of comparisons between epistemicallydistinguishable knowledge transfer, must include perspectives and doyennesfrom a recognisable, not implied, value standpoint
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信