局部脉冲波速度的测量:不同方法之间的一致

Rahul Manoj, V. R. Kiran, S. Ponkalaivani, P. Nabeel, M. Sivaprakasam, J. Joseph
{"title":"局部脉冲波速度的测量:不同方法之间的一致","authors":"Rahul Manoj, V. R. Kiran, S. Ponkalaivani, P. Nabeel, M. Sivaprakasam, J. Joseph","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The local pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the velocity with which the arterial pulse wave travels from the left ventricle to the vascular bed. Local PWV is clinically significant as a prognostic indicator of vascular damage. The measurement of local PWV involves several direct and indirect methods. However, there are limited studies that compare agreement among different methodologies. In this work, we investigated the agreement among several methods of measurement of PWV, such as the haemodynamic loop-based, Bramwell-Hill, transit-time-based and computational models of PWV. A small cohort of 35 participants (21male/14 female) aged between 21 and 51 years was recruited on voluntary consent. The measurement setup included duplex mode recording of carotid diameter and flow velocity waveforms from an ultrasound machine and simultaneous acquisition of dual-diameter waveforms and tonometry waveforms using an in-house developed bi-modal arterial probe. The carotid pressure waveform, flow velocity and dual diameter waveforms for evaluating the various methods of PWV measurement were obtained from the data processing. The group average value of PWV were obtained between 3.07±1.17m/s to 5.02±1.00m/s for various methods. The lowest and the highest group average PWV was reported using the haemodynamics-loop-based methods. There exists a strong and statistically significant correlation among PWV obtained using Bramwell-Hill equations and computational models (r>0.91, p<0.001), whereas a moderate and statistically significant correlation was observed between Bramwell-Hill and transit-time-based methods (r=0.67, p<0.001). The correlation was poor between Bramwell-Hill and loop-based methods (r~0.2, p<0.001). The study confirms the variations in the measurements in PWV using different methods and suggests their interchangeable usage is not advised.","PeriodicalId":191927,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Local Pulse Wave Velocity: Agreement Among Various Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Manoj, V. R. Kiran, S. Ponkalaivani, P. Nabeel, M. Sivaprakasam, J. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The local pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the velocity with which the arterial pulse wave travels from the left ventricle to the vascular bed. Local PWV is clinically significant as a prognostic indicator of vascular damage. The measurement of local PWV involves several direct and indirect methods. However, there are limited studies that compare agreement among different methodologies. In this work, we investigated the agreement among several methods of measurement of PWV, such as the haemodynamic loop-based, Bramwell-Hill, transit-time-based and computational models of PWV. A small cohort of 35 participants (21male/14 female) aged between 21 and 51 years was recruited on voluntary consent. The measurement setup included duplex mode recording of carotid diameter and flow velocity waveforms from an ultrasound machine and simultaneous acquisition of dual-diameter waveforms and tonometry waveforms using an in-house developed bi-modal arterial probe. The carotid pressure waveform, flow velocity and dual diameter waveforms for evaluating the various methods of PWV measurement were obtained from the data processing. The group average value of PWV were obtained between 3.07±1.17m/s to 5.02±1.00m/s for various methods. The lowest and the highest group average PWV was reported using the haemodynamics-loop-based methods. There exists a strong and statistically significant correlation among PWV obtained using Bramwell-Hill equations and computational models (r>0.91, p<0.001), whereas a moderate and statistically significant correlation was observed between Bramwell-Hill and transit-time-based methods (r=0.67, p<0.001). The correlation was poor between Bramwell-Hill and loop-based methods (r~0.2, p<0.001). The study confirms the variations in the measurements in PWV using different methods and suggests their interchangeable usage is not advised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部脉搏波速度(PWV)是动脉脉搏波从左心室传播到血管床的速度。局部PWV作为血管损伤的预后指标在临床上具有重要意义。局部PWV的测量包括几种直接和间接的方法。然而,比较不同方法之间的一致性的研究有限。在这项工作中,我们研究了几种测量PWV的方法之间的一致性,例如基于血流动力学环路的PWV, Bramwell-Hill,基于传输时间的PWV和计算模型。在自愿同意的情况下,招募了35名年龄在21至51岁之间的参与者(21名男性/14名女性)。测量装置包括双模式记录颈动脉直径和流速波形,并使用内部开发的双峰动脉探头同时采集双直径波形和血压计波形。通过数据处理得到颈动脉压力波形、流速波形和双径波形,用于评价各种PWV测量方法。各组PWV平均值为3.07±1.17m/s ~ 5.02±1.00m/s。使用基于血流动力学环的方法报告最低和最高组平均PWV。使用Bramwell-Hill方程和计算模型获得的PWV之间存在很强的统计学显著相关性(r>0.91, p<0.001),而Bramwell-Hill方法和基于过境时间的方法之间存在中度的统计学显著相关性(r=0.67, p<0.001)。Bramwell-Hill方法与基于循环的方法相关性较差(r~0.2, p<0.001)。该研究证实了使用不同方法测量PWV的差异,并建议不建议将其互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of Local Pulse Wave Velocity: Agreement Among Various Methodologies
The local pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the velocity with which the arterial pulse wave travels from the left ventricle to the vascular bed. Local PWV is clinically significant as a prognostic indicator of vascular damage. The measurement of local PWV involves several direct and indirect methods. However, there are limited studies that compare agreement among different methodologies. In this work, we investigated the agreement among several methods of measurement of PWV, such as the haemodynamic loop-based, Bramwell-Hill, transit-time-based and computational models of PWV. A small cohort of 35 participants (21male/14 female) aged between 21 and 51 years was recruited on voluntary consent. The measurement setup included duplex mode recording of carotid diameter and flow velocity waveforms from an ultrasound machine and simultaneous acquisition of dual-diameter waveforms and tonometry waveforms using an in-house developed bi-modal arterial probe. The carotid pressure waveform, flow velocity and dual diameter waveforms for evaluating the various methods of PWV measurement were obtained from the data processing. The group average value of PWV were obtained between 3.07±1.17m/s to 5.02±1.00m/s for various methods. The lowest and the highest group average PWV was reported using the haemodynamics-loop-based methods. There exists a strong and statistically significant correlation among PWV obtained using Bramwell-Hill equations and computational models (r>0.91, p<0.001), whereas a moderate and statistically significant correlation was observed between Bramwell-Hill and transit-time-based methods (r=0.67, p<0.001). The correlation was poor between Bramwell-Hill and loop-based methods (r~0.2, p<0.001). The study confirms the variations in the measurements in PWV using different methods and suggests their interchangeable usage is not advised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信