{"title":"群体动态过程和GDSS设计的综合,以促进创新的组织决策","authors":"L. Volonino, P. Drucker","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presents a synthesis of small group dynamics theory and practice that are of relevance to group decision support system (GDSS) designs, with special attention to the dynamics of productive discussion and innovative decision-making. Developing a climate conducive to innovational thinking in group decision situations requires the maintenance of equilibria between (1) the use of human judgment and analytic models; (2) conflict and conformity behaviors; and (3) the encouragement of open discussion tempered by the need to make progress. To facilitate the productiveness of group decision making and reduce meeting adversity, such balanced equilibria are proposed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384442,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A synthesis of group dynamic processes and GDSS designs to foster innovative organizational decisions\",\"authors\":\"L. Volonino, P. Drucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presents a synthesis of small group dynamics theory and practice that are of relevance to group decision support system (GDSS) designs, with special attention to the dynamics of productive discussion and innovative decision-making. Developing a climate conducive to innovational thinking in group decision situations requires the maintenance of equilibria between (1) the use of human judgment and analytic models; (2) conflict and conformity behaviors; and (3) the encouragement of open discussion tempered by the need to make progress. To facilitate the productiveness of group decision making and reduce meeting adversity, such balanced equilibria are proposed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":384442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A synthesis of group dynamic processes and GDSS designs to foster innovative organizational decisions
Presents a synthesis of small group dynamics theory and practice that are of relevance to group decision support system (GDSS) designs, with special attention to the dynamics of productive discussion and innovative decision-making. Developing a climate conducive to innovational thinking in group decision situations requires the maintenance of equilibria between (1) the use of human judgment and analytic models; (2) conflict and conformity behaviors; and (3) the encouragement of open discussion tempered by the need to make progress. To facilitate the productiveness of group decision making and reduce meeting adversity, such balanced equilibria are proposed.<>