基础计算机网络学习媒体计算机网络训练器的可用性、工效学和可扩展性比较

Faizal Arifuddin, Puspanda Hatta, E. Wihidayat
{"title":"基础计算机网络学习媒体计算机网络训练器的可用性、工效学和可扩展性比较","authors":"Faizal Arifuddin, Puspanda Hatta, E. Wihidayat","doi":"10.20961/ijie.v6i1.53901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of computer network trainers has become a major preference in vocational education because it is proven to be better than computer network simulation software. However, the use of existing computer network trainers (Desknet Trainer and Netcube Trainer) becomes overlapping in the domain of basic computer network courses. A comparison study was conducted in the aspect of usability, ergonomics, and extensibility to find out which trainer was the most suitable for handling basic computer networking courses. A quasi-experimental method with a counterbalanced design was chosen to compare computer network trainers. The T-test was conducted with the results stating that the data significance value was greater than the significance level (0.241 > 0.05). Then H0 is accepted with results stating that the two computer network trainers proved equal in handling basic computer networking learning. With such results, no recommendation can be drawn as to which trainer is superior. Both computer network trainers are allowed to be used together in basic computer network courses.","PeriodicalId":273558,"journal":{"name":"IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability, Ergonomics, and Extensibility Comparison of Computer Network Trainers for Basic Computer Network Learning Media\",\"authors\":\"Faizal Arifuddin, Puspanda Hatta, E. Wihidayat\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/ijie.v6i1.53901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of computer network trainers has become a major preference in vocational education because it is proven to be better than computer network simulation software. However, the use of existing computer network trainers (Desknet Trainer and Netcube Trainer) becomes overlapping in the domain of basic computer network courses. A comparison study was conducted in the aspect of usability, ergonomics, and extensibility to find out which trainer was the most suitable for handling basic computer networking courses. A quasi-experimental method with a counterbalanced design was chosen to compare computer network trainers. The T-test was conducted with the results stating that the data significance value was greater than the significance level (0.241 > 0.05). Then H0 is accepted with results stating that the two computer network trainers proved equal in handling basic computer networking learning. With such results, no recommendation can be drawn as to which trainer is superior. Both computer network trainers are allowed to be used together in basic computer network courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v6i1.53901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v6i1.53901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用计算机网络培训器已成为职业教育的主要偏好,因为它被证明比计算机网络模拟软件更好。然而,在计算机网络基础课程领域,现有的计算机网络培训器(Desknet Trainer和Netcube Trainer)的使用出现了重叠。从可用性、人机工程学和可扩展性三个方面进行对比研究,找出最适合教授计算机网络基础课程的培训师。采用平衡设计的准实验方法对计算机网络训练器进行比较。进行t检验,结果表明数据显著性值大于显著性水平(0.241 > 0.05)。然后接受H0,结果表明两个计算机网络训练器在处理基本的计算机网络学习方面证明是相等的。有了这样的结果,就不能提出哪个培训师更优秀的建议。两种计算机网络培训器可以在计算机网络基础课程中同时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability, Ergonomics, and Extensibility Comparison of Computer Network Trainers for Basic Computer Network Learning Media
The use of computer network trainers has become a major preference in vocational education because it is proven to be better than computer network simulation software. However, the use of existing computer network trainers (Desknet Trainer and Netcube Trainer) becomes overlapping in the domain of basic computer network courses. A comparison study was conducted in the aspect of usability, ergonomics, and extensibility to find out which trainer was the most suitable for handling basic computer networking courses. A quasi-experimental method with a counterbalanced design was chosen to compare computer network trainers. The T-test was conducted with the results stating that the data significance value was greater than the significance level (0.241 > 0.05). Then H0 is accepted with results stating that the two computer network trainers proved equal in handling basic computer networking learning. With such results, no recommendation can be drawn as to which trainer is superior. Both computer network trainers are allowed to be used together in basic computer network courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信