{"title":"法律实践中的机器学习:来自近代史的注释","authors":"Fernando A. Delgado","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Often framed as a relatively new and controversial phenomenon, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to legal analysis and decision-making in the US justice system has a rich yet under examined history. My research examines how ML came to be adopted as a standard tool for automating fact discovery for high-stakes civil litigation. By analyzing the key controversies and consensuses that emerge during the experimentation and early adoption phase of this technology (2008-2015), a useful case study presents itself in which an expert professional field wrestled with the challenges of integrating ML into sensitive decision-making workflows.","PeriodicalId":418125,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning in Legal Practice: Notes from Recent History\",\"authors\":\"Fernando A. Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3306618.3314324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Often framed as a relatively new and controversial phenomenon, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to legal analysis and decision-making in the US justice system has a rich yet under examined history. My research examines how ML came to be adopted as a standard tool for automating fact discovery for high-stakes civil litigation. By analyzing the key controversies and consensuses that emerge during the experimentation and early adoption phase of this technology (2008-2015), a useful case study presents itself in which an expert professional field wrestled with the challenges of integrating ML into sensitive decision-making workflows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning in Legal Practice: Notes from Recent History
Often framed as a relatively new and controversial phenomenon, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to legal analysis and decision-making in the US justice system has a rich yet under examined history. My research examines how ML came to be adopted as a standard tool for automating fact discovery for high-stakes civil litigation. By analyzing the key controversies and consensuses that emerge during the experimentation and early adoption phase of this technology (2008-2015), a useful case study presents itself in which an expert professional field wrestled with the challenges of integrating ML into sensitive decision-making workflows.