同质和异构网络核心交换机性能分析

Abid Ahmed Kasi, Faizullah Khan, Bilal Ashfaq Ahmed, Salman Rashid, Saima Waseem
{"title":"同质和异构网络核心交换机性能分析","authors":"Abid Ahmed Kasi, Faizullah Khan, Bilal Ashfaq Ahmed, Salman Rashid, Saima Waseem","doi":"10.1109/ISWSN.2017.8250041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper aims to find the performance difference of 3Com Core Builder 3500 Switch and Cisco 3550 Multilayer switch at various levels. There are 5 test beds designed to test the performance of these devices at individual level and then compare against each other. The topology used to perform these tests are very simple and easy to implement. Though collecting samples is easy, however it is time consuming. The data capture in all the tests is done using network analyzer tool, Wireshark and file transfer application called as FileZilla Server and Client. These tests are conducted multiple times to reduce the error rate which could have been a random number of 2% caused due to human and technical error. The results on the tests conducted are little surprising and complex than expected Cisco has a better data rate in all the tests performed with higher variations whereas 3Com had lower variations in all the tests it had a lower data rate than Cisco, again Cisco standard deviation is higher during bandwidth utilization. So as Conclusion Cisco's should be place in Distribution layer of a network as it is able to perform better at Layer 3.","PeriodicalId":390044,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Wireless Systems and Networks (ISWSN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of homogenous and heterogenous network core switches\",\"authors\":\"Abid Ahmed Kasi, Faizullah Khan, Bilal Ashfaq Ahmed, Salman Rashid, Saima Waseem\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISWSN.2017.8250041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper aims to find the performance difference of 3Com Core Builder 3500 Switch and Cisco 3550 Multilayer switch at various levels. There are 5 test beds designed to test the performance of these devices at individual level and then compare against each other. The topology used to perform these tests are very simple and easy to implement. Though collecting samples is easy, however it is time consuming. The data capture in all the tests is done using network analyzer tool, Wireshark and file transfer application called as FileZilla Server and Client. These tests are conducted multiple times to reduce the error rate which could have been a random number of 2% caused due to human and technical error. The results on the tests conducted are little surprising and complex than expected Cisco has a better data rate in all the tests performed with higher variations whereas 3Com had lower variations in all the tests it had a lower data rate than Cisco, again Cisco standard deviation is higher during bandwidth utilization. So as Conclusion Cisco's should be place in Distribution layer of a network as it is able to perform better at Layer 3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Symposium on Wireless Systems and Networks (ISWSN)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Symposium on Wireless Systems and Networks (ISWSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWSN.2017.8250041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Wireless Systems and Networks (ISWSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWSN.2017.8250041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在找出3Com Core Builder 3500交换机和Cisco 3550多层交换机在不同层次上的性能差异。我们设计了5个测试台,用于测试这些设备在单个层面的性能,然后相互比较。用于执行这些测试的拓扑非常简单,易于实现。虽然采集样品很容易,但是耗时长。所有测试中的数据捕获都是使用网络分析工具、Wireshark和文件传输应用程序FileZilla Server和Client完成的。这些测试进行了多次,以减少错误率,由于人为和技术错误,错误率可能是2%的随机数字。所进行的测试的结果并不令人惊讶,也比预期的复杂,思科在所有变化较大的测试中都有更好的数据速率,而3Com在所有测试中的变化较小,它的数据速率低于思科,思科在带宽利用期间的标准偏差也更高。因此,作为结论,思科应该放在网络的分布层,因为它能够在第三层表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of homogenous and heterogenous network core switches
This research paper aims to find the performance difference of 3Com Core Builder 3500 Switch and Cisco 3550 Multilayer switch at various levels. There are 5 test beds designed to test the performance of these devices at individual level and then compare against each other. The topology used to perform these tests are very simple and easy to implement. Though collecting samples is easy, however it is time consuming. The data capture in all the tests is done using network analyzer tool, Wireshark and file transfer application called as FileZilla Server and Client. These tests are conducted multiple times to reduce the error rate which could have been a random number of 2% caused due to human and technical error. The results on the tests conducted are little surprising and complex than expected Cisco has a better data rate in all the tests performed with higher variations whereas 3Com had lower variations in all the tests it had a lower data rate than Cisco, again Cisco standard deviation is higher during bandwidth utilization. So as Conclusion Cisco's should be place in Distribution layer of a network as it is able to perform better at Layer 3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信