E Jimenez-Castellanos Ballesteros, M Dominguez Fresco, C Anaya, M Lopez Lopez
{"title":"[侧突检查咬和半可调关节器的设置]。","authors":"E Jimenez-Castellanos Ballesteros, M Dominguez Fresco, C Anaya, M Lopez Lopez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors propose an original method for the setting of a semi-adjustable articulator based on latero-protrusive check-bites. This study compares two setting methods. The first was used as a control. It makes use of protrusion and lateral check-bites for the adjustment of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle. The second method, adjusts the two parameters using only latero-protrusion check-bites. Recordings were taken on 15 young patients aged from 24 to 32 years old, having a healthy and complete dentition without any subjective symptomatology of T.M.J. The recordings were always made by the same operator. According to a strict methodology, the same protocole was used for the recording of the check-bites with both methods, mounting of the models on the articulator and adjustment of the angles. For the first method, the check-bites were taken with a 5 mm protrusion previously determined on the articulator. This position was reported and marked in the mouth using indelible ink. Likewise, a 5 mm lateral bites position on the working side was determined for both sides. With the second method, the lateroprotrusion bites were taken with a 3 mm displacement of the condyle on the working side and 5 mm on the non-working side. In both methods, the values of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle were revealed and compared for all the patients. Subsequently to a statistical analysis, the authors concluded on the similarity of the results for the two methods, confirming the interest of a single latero-protrusion check-bite which is easier to obtain, is economical in terms of time, and entails a lesser number of bites to be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 73","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Latero-protrusive checkbites and setting of a semi-adjustable articulator].\",\"authors\":\"E Jimenez-Castellanos Ballesteros, M Dominguez Fresco, C Anaya, M Lopez Lopez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors propose an original method for the setting of a semi-adjustable articulator based on latero-protrusive check-bites. This study compares two setting methods. The first was used as a control. It makes use of protrusion and lateral check-bites for the adjustment of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle. The second method, adjusts the two parameters using only latero-protrusion check-bites. Recordings were taken on 15 young patients aged from 24 to 32 years old, having a healthy and complete dentition without any subjective symptomatology of T.M.J. The recordings were always made by the same operator. According to a strict methodology, the same protocole was used for the recording of the check-bites with both methods, mounting of the models on the articulator and adjustment of the angles. For the first method, the check-bites were taken with a 5 mm protrusion previously determined on the articulator. This position was reported and marked in the mouth using indelible ink. Likewise, a 5 mm lateral bites position on the working side was determined for both sides. With the second method, the lateroprotrusion bites were taken with a 3 mm displacement of the condyle on the working side and 5 mm on the non-working side. In both methods, the values of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle were revealed and compared for all the patients. Subsequently to a statistical analysis, the authors concluded on the similarity of the results for the two methods, confirming the interest of a single latero-protrusion check-bite which is easier to obtain, is economical in terms of time, and entails a lesser number of bites to be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Les Cahiers de prothese\",\"volume\":\" 73\",\"pages\":\"77-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Les Cahiers de prothese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Latero-protrusive checkbites and setting of a semi-adjustable articulator].
The authors propose an original method for the setting of a semi-adjustable articulator based on latero-protrusive check-bites. This study compares two setting methods. The first was used as a control. It makes use of protrusion and lateral check-bites for the adjustment of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle. The second method, adjusts the two parameters using only latero-protrusion check-bites. Recordings were taken on 15 young patients aged from 24 to 32 years old, having a healthy and complete dentition without any subjective symptomatology of T.M.J. The recordings were always made by the same operator. According to a strict methodology, the same protocole was used for the recording of the check-bites with both methods, mounting of the models on the articulator and adjustment of the angles. For the first method, the check-bites were taken with a 5 mm protrusion previously determined on the articulator. This position was reported and marked in the mouth using indelible ink. Likewise, a 5 mm lateral bites position on the working side was determined for both sides. With the second method, the lateroprotrusion bites were taken with a 3 mm displacement of the condyle on the working side and 5 mm on the non-working side. In both methods, the values of the condylar path angle and Bennett's angle were revealed and compared for all the patients. Subsequently to a statistical analysis, the authors concluded on the similarity of the results for the two methods, confirming the interest of a single latero-protrusion check-bite which is easier to obtain, is economical in terms of time, and entails a lesser number of bites to be made.