{"title":"经典IP:用于ATM网络的IP over ATM架构","authors":"A.J. Chaudhry","doi":"10.1109/ETACOM.1996.502465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper propose a standards based IP over ATM architectural model for ATM network(s). This model could coexist with the currently implemented proprietary architecture(s), but could also replace them without any major loss in functionality. This architecture allows a convenient migration path to the standards currently under development, like NHRP (Next Hop Resolution Protocol) and IRA (Integrated Routing and Addressing) that provide a far better functionality than any proprietary solution. The Classical IP model uses the standards presented in RFC 1577, UNI 3.x, and IISP (P-NNI phase 0) to implement logical IP subnet (LISs) across the ATM LAN(s) and do IP and ATM level routing between the LISs, facilitating standards based communication over ATM networks. Several options exist in the division/unification of ATM networks(s) into LIS(s). The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages associated with each available option, along with the associated implementation/management complexities and provides appropriate recommendations based on architecture salability, network reliability, and flexibility for future experimentation.","PeriodicalId":130942,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of COM'96. First Annual Conference on Emerging Technologies and Applications in Communications","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical IP: IP over ATM architecture for ATM networks\",\"authors\":\"A.J. Chaudhry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETACOM.1996.502465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper propose a standards based IP over ATM architectural model for ATM network(s). This model could coexist with the currently implemented proprietary architecture(s), but could also replace them without any major loss in functionality. This architecture allows a convenient migration path to the standards currently under development, like NHRP (Next Hop Resolution Protocol) and IRA (Integrated Routing and Addressing) that provide a far better functionality than any proprietary solution. The Classical IP model uses the standards presented in RFC 1577, UNI 3.x, and IISP (P-NNI phase 0) to implement logical IP subnet (LISs) across the ATM LAN(s) and do IP and ATM level routing between the LISs, facilitating standards based communication over ATM networks. Several options exist in the division/unification of ATM networks(s) into LIS(s). The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages associated with each available option, along with the associated implementation/management complexities and provides appropriate recommendations based on architecture salability, network reliability, and flexibility for future experimentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of COM'96. First Annual Conference on Emerging Technologies and Applications in Communications\",\"volume\":\"208 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of COM'96. First Annual Conference on Emerging Technologies and Applications in Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETACOM.1996.502465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of COM'96. First Annual Conference on Emerging Technologies and Applications in Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETACOM.1996.502465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
针对ATM网络,提出了一种基于标准的IP over ATM体系结构模型。该模型可以与当前实现的专有架构共存,但也可以在功能上没有任何重大损失的情况下取代它们。这种架构允许方便地迁移到目前正在开发的标准,如NHRP(下一跳解析协议)和IRA(集成路由和寻址),它们提供了比任何专有解决方案更好的功能。经典IP模型使用RFC 1577, UNI 3中提出的标准。x和IISP (P-NNI阶段0)实现跨ATM局域网的逻辑IP子网(LISs),并在LISs之间进行IP和ATM级别的路由,促进ATM网络上基于标准的通信。将ATM网络划分/统一为多个LIS存在几种选择。本文讨论了与每个可用选项相关的优点和缺点,以及相关的实现/管理复杂性,并根据架构可销售性、网络可靠性和未来实验的灵活性提供了适当的建议。
Classical IP: IP over ATM architecture for ATM networks
The paper propose a standards based IP over ATM architectural model for ATM network(s). This model could coexist with the currently implemented proprietary architecture(s), but could also replace them without any major loss in functionality. This architecture allows a convenient migration path to the standards currently under development, like NHRP (Next Hop Resolution Protocol) and IRA (Integrated Routing and Addressing) that provide a far better functionality than any proprietary solution. The Classical IP model uses the standards presented in RFC 1577, UNI 3.x, and IISP (P-NNI phase 0) to implement logical IP subnet (LISs) across the ATM LAN(s) and do IP and ATM level routing between the LISs, facilitating standards based communication over ATM networks. Several options exist in the division/unification of ATM networks(s) into LIS(s). The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages associated with each available option, along with the associated implementation/management complexities and provides appropriate recommendations based on architecture salability, network reliability, and flexibility for future experimentation.