使用SPIN自动检查架构模型的一致性

P. Inverardi, H. Muccini, Patrizio Pelliccione
{"title":"使用SPIN自动检查架构模型的一致性","authors":"P. Inverardi, H. Muccini, Patrizio Pelliccione","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2001.989826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the necessity for handling different aspects of the system separately has introduced the need to represent SA (software architectures) from different viewpoints. In particular, behavioral views are recognized to be one of the most attractive features in the SA description, and in practical contexts, state diagrams and scenarios are the most widely used tools to model this view. Although very expressive, this approach has two drawbacks: system specification incompleteness and view consistency. Our work can be put in this context with the aim of managing incompleteness and checking view conformance: we propose the use of state diagrams and scenario models for representing system dynamics at the architectural level; they can be incomplete and we want to prove that they describe, from different viewpoints, the same system behavior. To reach this goal, we use the SPIN model checker and we implement a tool to manage the translation of architectural models in Promela and LTL.","PeriodicalId":433615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated check of architectural models consistency using SPIN\",\"authors\":\"P. Inverardi, H. Muccini, Patrizio Pelliccione\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2001.989826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years the necessity for handling different aspects of the system separately has introduced the need to represent SA (software architectures) from different viewpoints. In particular, behavioral views are recognized to be one of the most attractive features in the SA description, and in practical contexts, state diagrams and scenarios are the most widely used tools to model this view. Although very expressive, this approach has two drawbacks: system specification incompleteness and view consistency. Our work can be put in this context with the aim of managing incompleteness and checking view conformance: we propose the use of state diagrams and scenario models for representing system dynamics at the architectural level; they can be incomplete and we want to prove that they describe, from different viewpoints, the same system behavior. To reach this goal, we use the SPIN model checker and we implement a tool to manage the translation of architectural models in Promela and LTL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

近年来,由于需要分别处理系统的不同方面,因此需要从不同的角度来表示SA(软件体系结构)。特别是,行为视图被认为是SA描述中最吸引人的特性之一,并且在实际上下文中,状态图和场景是最广泛用于对该视图建模的工具。尽管表达能力很强,但这种方法有两个缺点:系统规范不完整和视图一致性。我们的工作可以放在这样的环境中,目的是管理不完整性和检查视图一致性:我们建议使用状态图和场景模型来表示体系结构级别的系统动态;它们可以是不完整的,我们想要证明它们从不同的角度,描述了相同的系统行为。为了达到这个目标,我们使用SPIN模型检查器,并实现一个工具来管理Promela和LTL中体系结构模型的转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated check of architectural models consistency using SPIN
In recent years the necessity for handling different aspects of the system separately has introduced the need to represent SA (software architectures) from different viewpoints. In particular, behavioral views are recognized to be one of the most attractive features in the SA description, and in practical contexts, state diagrams and scenarios are the most widely used tools to model this view. Although very expressive, this approach has two drawbacks: system specification incompleteness and view consistency. Our work can be put in this context with the aim of managing incompleteness and checking view conformance: we propose the use of state diagrams and scenario models for representing system dynamics at the architectural level; they can be incomplete and we want to prove that they describe, from different viewpoints, the same system behavior. To reach this goal, we use the SPIN model checker and we implement a tool to manage the translation of architectural models in Promela and LTL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信