意大利电休克疗法:公众争议会停止吗?

C. Buccelli, P. Di Lorenzo, M. Paternoster, G. D’Urso, V. Graziano, M. Niola
{"title":"意大利电休克疗法:公众争议会停止吗?","authors":"C. Buccelli, P. Di Lorenzo, M. Paternoster, G. D’Urso, V. Graziano, M. Niola","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still very limited in Italy for ideological rather than scientific reasons. Objectives To describe the public controversies surrounding ECT in Italy and to propose a plan of action to resolve the dispute. Methods We describe the historical background and the current public controversies about ECT by reviewing the official documents issued by the entities involved in the debate and by reporting our personal experiences of ECT practice. Results According to the highest legal and health authorities, there are no ethical reasons for doubting the licit nature of ECT. However, because of politically and ideologically based conflicts, public ECT centers are still lacking. The situation could further deteriorate because local initiatives are endeavoring to criminalize and ban the treatment. Conclusions The enactment of specific regulations and guidelines concerning the use of ECT by the Italian government is highly warranted to increase the availability of the treatment. Education and information campaigns must strive to increase the knowledge of health professionals and the lay public regarding the safe and beneficial use of ECT.","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroconvulsive Therapy in Italy: Will Public Controversies Ever Stop?\",\"authors\":\"C. Buccelli, P. Di Lorenzo, M. Paternoster, G. D’Urso, V. Graziano, M. Niola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still very limited in Italy for ideological rather than scientific reasons. Objectives To describe the public controversies surrounding ECT in Italy and to propose a plan of action to resolve the dispute. Methods We describe the historical background and the current public controversies about ECT by reviewing the official documents issued by the entities involved in the debate and by reporting our personal experiences of ECT practice. Results According to the highest legal and health authorities, there are no ethical reasons for doubting the licit nature of ECT. However, because of politically and ideologically based conflicts, public ECT centers are still lacking. The situation could further deteriorate because local initiatives are endeavoring to criminalize and ban the treatment. Conclusions The enactment of specific regulations and guidelines concerning the use of ECT by the Italian government is highly warranted to increase the availability of the treatment. Education and information campaigns must strive to increase the knowledge of health professionals and the lay public regarding the safe and beneficial use of ECT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:在意大利,由于意识形态原因而非科学原因,电痉挛疗法(ECT)的使用仍然非常有限。目的描述意大利围绕ECT的公众争议,并提出解决争议的行动计划。方法通过查阅参与争论的机构发布的官方文件和报告我们个人的电痉挛治疗实践经验,来描述电痉挛治疗的历史背景和当前的公众争议。结果根据最高法律和卫生当局的意见,没有任何伦理理由怀疑电痉挛疗法的合法性。然而,由于政治和意识形态的冲突,公共ECT中心仍然缺乏。情况可能进一步恶化,因为当地正在努力将这种治疗定为犯罪并加以禁止。结论意大利政府制定有关ECT使用的具体法规和指南是非常必要的,以增加治疗的可获得性。教育和宣传运动必须努力提高卫生专业人员和普通公众对安全有益地使用电痉挛疗法的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electroconvulsive Therapy in Italy: Will Public Controversies Ever Stop?
Background The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still very limited in Italy for ideological rather than scientific reasons. Objectives To describe the public controversies surrounding ECT in Italy and to propose a plan of action to resolve the dispute. Methods We describe the historical background and the current public controversies about ECT by reviewing the official documents issued by the entities involved in the debate and by reporting our personal experiences of ECT practice. Results According to the highest legal and health authorities, there are no ethical reasons for doubting the licit nature of ECT. However, because of politically and ideologically based conflicts, public ECT centers are still lacking. The situation could further deteriorate because local initiatives are endeavoring to criminalize and ban the treatment. Conclusions The enactment of specific regulations and guidelines concerning the use of ECT by the Italian government is highly warranted to increase the availability of the treatment. Education and information campaigns must strive to increase the knowledge of health professionals and the lay public regarding the safe and beneficial use of ECT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信