F. Lanza, A. A. de Camargo, Lilian Rocha Ferraz Archija, Jenifer Santos, Jessyca P Selman, S. Dal Corso
{"title":"视觉反馈增加胸壁活动测量:一项横断面研究","authors":"F. Lanza, A. A. de Camargo, Lilian Rocha Ferraz Archija, Jenifer Santos, Jessyca P Selman, S. Dal Corso","doi":"10.3109/21679169.2014.924991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Visual feedback could optimize the evaluation of chest wall mobility. Objective: To compare chest wall mobility performed with and without visual feedback. Methods: Cross-sectional study, 64 healthy volunteers, average age 24 years old. The thorax circumference was measured at two locations, the axillary and xiphisternum regions, by a tape placed at the anterior axillary line and at the xiphoid process. The evaluations were performed: (i) after verbal explanation (without visual feedback), (ii) after verbal explanation plus visual feedback (with visual feedback); for this evaluation the volunteer remained in front of the computer, which provides visual feedback. Results: There was no difference between axillary measurement with vs. without feedback (7.5 ± 2.4 cm vs. 7.9 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.215), but significant difference between xiphisternum measurement 7.1 ± 2.7cm with feedback vs. 6.5 ± 2.3cm without feedback, p = 0.043. Low intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the axillary measurement [0.51 (0.19–0.72, p = 0.003) and for xiphisternum measurement [0.60 (0.35–0.76, p < 0.001) performed with and without feedback, respectively. Conclusion: Thoracic mobility presents great variability when compared with and without feedback, so the visual stimulus must be taken into account in this evaluation.","PeriodicalId":186472,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual feedback increases chest wall mobility measure: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"F. Lanza, A. A. de Camargo, Lilian Rocha Ferraz Archija, Jenifer Santos, Jessyca P Selman, S. Dal Corso\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/21679169.2014.924991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Visual feedback could optimize the evaluation of chest wall mobility. Objective: To compare chest wall mobility performed with and without visual feedback. Methods: Cross-sectional study, 64 healthy volunteers, average age 24 years old. The thorax circumference was measured at two locations, the axillary and xiphisternum regions, by a tape placed at the anterior axillary line and at the xiphoid process. The evaluations were performed: (i) after verbal explanation (without visual feedback), (ii) after verbal explanation plus visual feedback (with visual feedback); for this evaluation the volunteer remained in front of the computer, which provides visual feedback. Results: There was no difference between axillary measurement with vs. without feedback (7.5 ± 2.4 cm vs. 7.9 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.215), but significant difference between xiphisternum measurement 7.1 ± 2.7cm with feedback vs. 6.5 ± 2.3cm without feedback, p = 0.043. Low intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the axillary measurement [0.51 (0.19–0.72, p = 0.003) and for xiphisternum measurement [0.60 (0.35–0.76, p < 0.001) performed with and without feedback, respectively. Conclusion: Thoracic mobility presents great variability when compared with and without feedback, so the visual stimulus must be taken into account in this evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2014.924991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2014.924991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:视觉反馈可以优化胸壁运动的评价。目的:比较有无视觉反馈的胸壁运动。方法:横断面研究,健康志愿者64例,平均年龄24岁。在腋窝前线和剑突处放置胶带,测量腋窝和剑胸骨两个位置的胸围。评估进行:(i)口头解释后(无视觉反馈),(ii)口头解释加视觉反馈后(有视觉反馈);在这项评估中,志愿者一直坐在电脑前,电脑提供视觉反馈。结果:有反馈的腋窝测量与无反馈的腋窝测量差异无统计学意义(7.5±2.4 cm vs. 7.9±3.3 cm, p = 0.215),有反馈的腋窝测量与无反馈的腋窝测量差异有统计学意义(7.1±2.7cm vs. 6.5±2.3cm, p = 0.043)。有反馈和无反馈时,腋窝测量[0.51 (0.19-0.72,p = 0.003)]和剑胸骨测量[0.60 (0.35-0.76,p < 0.001)]的类内相关系数较低。结论:在有无反馈的情况下,胸椎活动度表现出很大的变异性,因此在评估时必须考虑视觉刺激。
Visual feedback increases chest wall mobility measure: A cross-sectional study
Abstract Background: Visual feedback could optimize the evaluation of chest wall mobility. Objective: To compare chest wall mobility performed with and without visual feedback. Methods: Cross-sectional study, 64 healthy volunteers, average age 24 years old. The thorax circumference was measured at two locations, the axillary and xiphisternum regions, by a tape placed at the anterior axillary line and at the xiphoid process. The evaluations were performed: (i) after verbal explanation (without visual feedback), (ii) after verbal explanation plus visual feedback (with visual feedback); for this evaluation the volunteer remained in front of the computer, which provides visual feedback. Results: There was no difference between axillary measurement with vs. without feedback (7.5 ± 2.4 cm vs. 7.9 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.215), but significant difference between xiphisternum measurement 7.1 ± 2.7cm with feedback vs. 6.5 ± 2.3cm without feedback, p = 0.043. Low intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the axillary measurement [0.51 (0.19–0.72, p = 0.003) and for xiphisternum measurement [0.60 (0.35–0.76, p < 0.001) performed with and without feedback, respectively. Conclusion: Thoracic mobility presents great variability when compared with and without feedback, so the visual stimulus must be taken into account in this evaluation.