挪威的石油收入和宏观经济波动

François Boye
{"title":"挪威的石油收入和宏观经济波动","authors":"François Boye","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00196.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is conventional wisdom that Norway is the role model for oil-producing countries; its sensible policies and transparency in the management of its oil revenues have resulted in macroeconomic stability, which most oil producing countries from Africa and Latin America, hobbled by cycles of boom and bust or a Dutch disease, have always been denied. \n \n \n \nThis paper does not take this conventional wisdom for granted given that the Norwegian government's fiscal policy has remained aligned with the cycles of the international oil market. To test whether the Norwegian economy is stable, this paper considers whether the famous 2001 stabilisation policy reform, meant to spread the spending of oil revenues over time, has ushered in a period of lower volatility in Norway. Its results are negative: (i) volatility in Norway's macroeconomic variables has increased after 2001; (ii) that the behaviour of either the Central Bank or the macroeconomy has changed after 2001 is not robust to modelling techniques; and (iii) had it been fully implemented, the 2001 stabilisation policy package would have had destabilising effects. In other words, Norway's volatility is not as insignificant as expected.","PeriodicalId":103205,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil Revenues and Macroeconomic Volatility in Norway\",\"authors\":\"François Boye\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00196.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is conventional wisdom that Norway is the role model for oil-producing countries; its sensible policies and transparency in the management of its oil revenues have resulted in macroeconomic stability, which most oil producing countries from Africa and Latin America, hobbled by cycles of boom and bust or a Dutch disease, have always been denied. \\n \\n \\n \\nThis paper does not take this conventional wisdom for granted given that the Norwegian government's fiscal policy has remained aligned with the cycles of the international oil market. To test whether the Norwegian economy is stable, this paper considers whether the famous 2001 stabilisation policy reform, meant to spread the spending of oil revenues over time, has ushered in a period of lower volatility in Norway. Its results are negative: (i) volatility in Norway's macroeconomic variables has increased after 2001; (ii) that the behaviour of either the Central Bank or the macroeconomy has changed after 2001 is not robust to modelling techniques; and (iii) had it been fully implemented, the 2001 stabilisation policy package would have had destabilising effects. In other words, Norway's volatility is not as insignificant as expected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00196.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: OPEC Energy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00196.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统观点认为,挪威是产油国的榜样;其明智的政策和石油收入管理的透明度导致了宏观经济的稳定,而非洲和拉丁美洲的大多数石油生产国一直被繁荣与萧条的周期或荷兰病所困扰。鉴于挪威政府的财政政策一直与国际石油市场的周期保持一致,本文并不认为这种传统智慧是理所当然的。为了检验挪威经济是否稳定,本文考虑了2001年著名的稳定政策改革(旨在分散石油收入的支出)是否为挪威带来了一段波动性较低的时期。其结果是负面的:(i)挪威宏观经济变量的波动性在2001年后有所增加;(ii)中央银行或宏观经济的行为在2001年之后发生了变化,对建模技术来说并不稳健;(三)如果全面实施,2001年的一揽子稳定政策将产生破坏稳定的效果。换句话说,挪威的波动并不像预期的那样微不足道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oil Revenues and Macroeconomic Volatility in Norway
It is conventional wisdom that Norway is the role model for oil-producing countries; its sensible policies and transparency in the management of its oil revenues have resulted in macroeconomic stability, which most oil producing countries from Africa and Latin America, hobbled by cycles of boom and bust or a Dutch disease, have always been denied. This paper does not take this conventional wisdom for granted given that the Norwegian government's fiscal policy has remained aligned with the cycles of the international oil market. To test whether the Norwegian economy is stable, this paper considers whether the famous 2001 stabilisation policy reform, meant to spread the spending of oil revenues over time, has ushered in a period of lower volatility in Norway. Its results are negative: (i) volatility in Norway's macroeconomic variables has increased after 2001; (ii) that the behaviour of either the Central Bank or the macroeconomy has changed after 2001 is not robust to modelling techniques; and (iii) had it been fully implemented, the 2001 stabilisation policy package would have had destabilising effects. In other words, Norway's volatility is not as insignificant as expected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信