用于WS-Policy的语义注释

Sebastian Speiser
{"title":"用于WS-Policy的语义注释","authors":"Sebastian Speiser","doi":"10.1109/ICWS.2010.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WS-Policy is a standard to express requirements and capabilities in Web service systems. Policies are based on domain-specific assertions. In this paper we present a lightweight approach to semantic annotations of policy assertions. The approach allows matching of requirements and capabilities based not only on the syntactical representation of their corresponding assertions but also on their semantic meaning. Besides vocabulary mismatches our approach can also handle granularity mismatches, e.g. if two capabilities in combination satisfy a single requirement. We present a validation of our approach consisting of a performance evaluation and the realization of a use case, both based on our implementation of the semantic policy matching algorithm. We furthermore show the advantages of our approach compared to existing related work.","PeriodicalId":170573,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantic Annotations for WS-Policy\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Speiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICWS.2010.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"WS-Policy is a standard to express requirements and capabilities in Web service systems. Policies are based on domain-specific assertions. In this paper we present a lightweight approach to semantic annotations of policy assertions. The approach allows matching of requirements and capabilities based not only on the syntactical representation of their corresponding assertions but also on their semantic meaning. Besides vocabulary mismatches our approach can also handle granularity mismatches, e.g. if two capabilities in combination satisfy a single requirement. We present a validation of our approach consisting of a performance evaluation and the realization of a use case, both based on our implementation of the semantic policy matching algorithm. We furthermore show the advantages of our approach compared to existing related work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2010.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2010.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

WS-Policy是在Web服务系统中表达需求和功能的标准。策略基于特定于域的断言。本文提出了一种轻量级的策略断言语义注释方法。该方法允许匹配需求和功能,不仅基于它们对应断言的语法表示,而且基于它们的语义含义。除了词汇表不匹配,我们的方法还可以处理粒度不匹配,例如,如果两个功能组合在一起满足单个需求。我们提出了对我们的方法的验证,包括性能评估和用例的实现,两者都基于我们对语义策略匹配算法的实现。与现有的相关工作相比,我们进一步展示了我们的方法的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semantic Annotations for WS-Policy
WS-Policy is a standard to express requirements and capabilities in Web service systems. Policies are based on domain-specific assertions. In this paper we present a lightweight approach to semantic annotations of policy assertions. The approach allows matching of requirements and capabilities based not only on the syntactical representation of their corresponding assertions but also on their semantic meaning. Besides vocabulary mismatches our approach can also handle granularity mismatches, e.g. if two capabilities in combination satisfy a single requirement. We present a validation of our approach consisting of a performance evaluation and the realization of a use case, both based on our implementation of the semantic policy matching algorithm. We furthermore show the advantages of our approach compared to existing related work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信