基于动态最优随机存取(DORA)协议与动态源路由(DSRP)协议的V2N车辆智能交通管理系统的比较研究

2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT) Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179795

C. Raghavendra, N. Deepa

{"title":"基于动态最优随机存取(DORA)协议与动态源路由(DSRP)协议的V2N车辆智能交通管理系统的比较研究","authors":"C. Raghavendra, N. Deepa","doi":"10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to find traffic management system in Vehicle to NH Road to analyze packet delivery ratio using Dynamic optimal random access in comparison with Dynamic source routing protocol in wireless networking. Materials and Methods: Low packet delivery ratio are performed with traffic dataset. classification of dynamic optimal random-access protocol where a number of the samples are ($\\mathrm{N}=26$) and dynamic source routing protocol where a number of the samples ($\\mathrm{N}=26$) obtained using the G-power value is 80%. Results and Discussion: Dynamic Optimal Random Access and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. The mean of Dynamic Optimal Random Access is 17.27 and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol is 14.77. T-Test for comparison for Dynamic Optimal Random Access standard error mean (0.335) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (0.416). Novel traffic management system from the dataset has a packet delivery ratio of 95% which can be comparatively higher than dynamic source routing protocol accuracy. The significance value of accuracy is 0.157 ($p > 0.05$). Conclusion: Dynamic optimal random access performs better in finding packet delivery ratio when compared to dynamic source routing protocol.","PeriodicalId":180790,"journal":{"name":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intelligent Traffic Management System in Vehicle-to-NH Road (V2N) using Dynamic Optimal Random Access (DORA) protocol in Comparison with Dynamic Source Routing (DSRP) Protocol to Improve Packet Delivery Ratio\",\"authors\":\"C. Raghavendra, N. Deepa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is to find traffic management system in Vehicle to NH Road to analyze packet delivery ratio using Dynamic optimal random access in comparison with Dynamic source routing protocol in wireless networking. Materials and Methods: Low packet delivery ratio are performed with traffic dataset. classification of dynamic optimal random-access protocol where a number of the samples are ($\\\\mathrm{N}=26$) and dynamic source routing protocol where a number of the samples ($\\\\mathrm{N}=26$) obtained using the G-power value is 80%. Results and Discussion: Dynamic Optimal Random Access and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. The mean of Dynamic Optimal Random Access is 17.27 and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol is 14.77. T-Test for comparison for Dynamic Optimal Random Access standard error mean (0.335) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (0.416). Novel traffic management system from the dataset has a packet delivery ratio of 95% which can be comparatively higher than dynamic source routing protocol accuracy. The significance value of accuracy is 0.157 ($p > 0.05$). Conclusion: Dynamic optimal random access performs better in finding packet delivery ratio when compared to dynamic source routing protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是找出车辆到NH路的交通管理系统，比较动态最优随机存取与动态源路由协议在无线网路中的传输比率。材料与方法:利用流量数据集进行低包投递率测试。动态最优随机访问协议的样本个数为($\mathrm{N}=26$)，动态源路由协议的样本个数为($\mathrm{N}=26$)，使用G-power值为80%。结果与讨论:动态最优随机接入与动态源路由协议。动态最优随机接入协议的均值为17.27，动态源路由协议的均值为14.77。比较动态最优随机接入标准误差均值(0.335)和动态源路由协议(0.416)的t检验。基于该数据集的流量管理系统具有95%的数据包投递率，相对高于动态源路由协议的准确率。准确率显著性值为0.157 (p > 0.05)。结论:与动态源路由协议相比，动态最优随机接入在查找包投递率方面具有更好的性能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

An Intelligent Traffic Management System in Vehicle-to-NH Road (V2N) using Dynamic Optimal Random Access (DORA) protocol in Comparison with Dynamic Source Routing (DSRP) Protocol to Improve Packet Delivery Ratio

The aim of the study is to find traffic management system in Vehicle to NH Road to analyze packet delivery ratio using Dynamic optimal random access in comparison with Dynamic source routing protocol in wireless networking. Materials and Methods: Low packet delivery ratio are performed with traffic dataset. classification of dynamic optimal random-access protocol where a number of the samples are ($\mathrm{N}=26$) and dynamic source routing protocol where a number of the samples ($\mathrm{N}=26$) obtained using the G-power value is 80%. Results and Discussion: Dynamic Optimal Random Access and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. The mean of Dynamic Optimal Random Access is 17.27 and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol is 14.77. T-Test for comparison for Dynamic Optimal Random Access standard error mean (0.335) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (0.416). Novel traffic management system from the dataset has a packet delivery ratio of 95% which can be comparatively higher than dynamic source routing protocol accuracy. The significance value of accuracy is 0.157 ($p > 0.05$). Conclusion: Dynamic optimal random access performs better in finding packet delivery ratio when compared to dynamic source routing protocol.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)

自引率

0.00%

发文量