比较知识编纂方法:一项实证研究

J. Rabelo, Davi Viana, T. Conte, Gleison Santos
{"title":"比较知识编纂方法:一项实证研究","authors":"J. Rabelo, Davi Viana, T. Conte, Gleison Santos","doi":"10.1109/SBSC.2012.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knowledge acquired by the members of a software organization is one of its most important assets. Therefore, the proper management of this knowledge has become a real need in the software development industry. One of the approaches to encourage knowledge transfer is its adequate formalization. This method can facilitate knowledge learning and usage. However, knowledge formalization is not trivial and there are several related strategies. This paper presents a qualitative study, in which we compared two knowledge codification support strategies: ABC-Pattern and Mind Map. The results indicate that the participants had a preference in using the ABC-Pattern approach due to its usage and utility. We identified some of the reasons for this preference: a) more codification detail, b) a more detailed description of the knowledgeâs scenario which is more clarifying, c) the possibility of acquiring more information with less effort, and d) the possibility of describing both the problem and the solution.","PeriodicalId":257965,"journal":{"name":"2012 Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Knowledge Codification Approaches: An Empirical Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Rabelo, Davi Viana, T. Conte, Gleison Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBSC.2012.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The knowledge acquired by the members of a software organization is one of its most important assets. Therefore, the proper management of this knowledge has become a real need in the software development industry. One of the approaches to encourage knowledge transfer is its adequate formalization. This method can facilitate knowledge learning and usage. However, knowledge formalization is not trivial and there are several related strategies. This paper presents a qualitative study, in which we compared two knowledge codification support strategies: ABC-Pattern and Mind Map. The results indicate that the participants had a preference in using the ABC-Pattern approach due to its usage and utility. We identified some of the reasons for this preference: a) more codification detail, b) a more detailed description of the knowledgeâs scenario which is more clarifying, c) the possibility of acquiring more information with less effort, and d) the possibility of describing both the problem and the solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBSC.2012.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBSC.2012.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

软件组织成员所获得的知识是其最重要的资产之一。因此,对这些知识的适当管理已成为软件开发行业的实际需求。鼓励知识转移的方法之一是使其充分形式化。这种方法便于知识的学习和使用。然而,知识形式化并不是微不足道的,有几种相关的策略。本文对abc模式和思维导图两种知识编码支持策略进行了定性研究。结果表明,由于abc模式的实用性和实用性,被试更倾向于使用abc模式。我们确定了这种偏好的一些原因:a)更多的编纂细节,b)更详细的知识情景描述,这更清晰,c)用更少的努力获得更多信息的可能性,d)描述问题和解决方案的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Knowledge Codification Approaches: An Empirical Study
The knowledge acquired by the members of a software organization is one of its most important assets. Therefore, the proper management of this knowledge has become a real need in the software development industry. One of the approaches to encourage knowledge transfer is its adequate formalization. This method can facilitate knowledge learning and usage. However, knowledge formalization is not trivial and there are several related strategies. This paper presents a qualitative study, in which we compared two knowledge codification support strategies: ABC-Pattern and Mind Map. The results indicate that the participants had a preference in using the ABC-Pattern approach due to its usage and utility. We identified some of the reasons for this preference: a) more codification detail, b) a more detailed description of the knowledgeâs scenario which is more clarifying, c) the possibility of acquiring more information with less effort, and d) the possibility of describing both the problem and the solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信