引文功能的标注方案

SIGDIAL Workshop Pub Date : 2009-07-15 DOI:10.3115/1654595.1654612

Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, Dan Tidhar

{"title":"引文功能的标注方案","authors":"Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, Dan Tidhar","doi":"10.3115/1654595.1654612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the interplay of the discourse structure of a scientific argument with formal citations. One subproblem of this is to classify academic citations in scientific articles according to their rhetorical function, e.g., as a rival approach, as a part of the solution, or as a flawed approach that justifies the current research. Here, we introduce our annotation scheme with 12 categories, and present an agreement study.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"132","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An annotation scheme for citation function\",\"authors\":\"Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, Dan Tidhar\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1654595.1654612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the interplay of the discourse structure of a scientific argument with formal citations. One subproblem of this is to classify academic citations in scientific articles according to their rhetorical function, e.g., as a rival approach, as a part of the solution, or as a flawed approach that justifies the current research. Here, we introduce our annotation scheme with 12 categories, and present an agreement study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"132\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1654595.1654612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1654595.1654612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 132

摘要

我们研究了科学论证的话语结构与形式引用的相互作用。这个问题的一个子问题是根据它们的修辞功能对科学文章中的学术引用进行分类，例如，作为一种竞争方法，作为解决方案的一部分，或者作为证明当前研究的有缺陷的方法。本文介绍了我们的12类标注方案，并进行了一致性研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

An annotation scheme for citation function

We study the interplay of the discourse structure of a scientific argument with formal citations. One subproblem of this is to classify academic citations in scientific articles according to their rhetorical function, e.g., as a rival approach, as a part of the solution, or as a flawed approach that justifies the current research. Here, we introduce our annotation scheme with 12 categories, and present an agreement study.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SIGDIAL Workshop

自引率

0.00%

发文量