撒切尔主义在欧洲劳资关系中的遗产:新自由主义政治和紧缩政策对四分五裂的欧洲劳资谈判的影响

M. Lucio, A. Koukiadaki, I. Tavora
{"title":"撒切尔主义在欧洲劳资关系中的遗产:新自由主义政治和紧缩政策对四分五裂的欧洲劳资谈判的影响","authors":"M. Lucio, A. Koukiadaki, I. Tavora","doi":"10.13169/INSTEMPLRIGHJ.2.1.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing popularity of neo-liberalist ideologies and the impact of state-imposed austerity measures has been having a detrimental impact on the structure of industrial relations within the European Union (EU), especially in the periphery of Europe. This report assesses these developments in the EU member states most affected by the most recent economic crisis, namely Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Spain. We highlight how trade unions in the countries assessed are increasingly constrained in their ability to regulate the conditions of work through collective agreements, which have systematically deteriorated, making it difficult to sustain mobilisation and negotiation strategies. This has had a deleterious effect on pay and working time. Broader austerity measures have also had a substantial impact on areas such as labour inspection, judicial processes and state mediation services, leading to heightened disorganisation of labour relations with negative effects for both workers and management. The impact of neo-liberal and anti-trade union ideas initially inspired by the New Right in the United Kingdom and the United States of America during the 1980s has played a significant role in shaping the ideology behind this shift in EU policy towards ‘weaker states’. We therefore argue that this political heritage of disorganising labour relations carries great risks in social and organisational terms for all actors concerned, especially workers and their representatives. To this end, we develop the critique of deregulation outlined in Ewing et al (2016) and argue that coordinated structures are important for questions of social justice.","PeriodicalId":247208,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Employment Rights Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The legacy of Thatcherism in European labour relations: the impact of the politics of neo-liberalism and austerity on collective bargaining in a fragmenting Europe\",\"authors\":\"M. Lucio, A. Koukiadaki, I. Tavora\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/INSTEMPLRIGHJ.2.1.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ongoing popularity of neo-liberalist ideologies and the impact of state-imposed austerity measures has been having a detrimental impact on the structure of industrial relations within the European Union (EU), especially in the periphery of Europe. This report assesses these developments in the EU member states most affected by the most recent economic crisis, namely Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Spain. We highlight how trade unions in the countries assessed are increasingly constrained in their ability to regulate the conditions of work through collective agreements, which have systematically deteriorated, making it difficult to sustain mobilisation and negotiation strategies. This has had a deleterious effect on pay and working time. Broader austerity measures have also had a substantial impact on areas such as labour inspection, judicial processes and state mediation services, leading to heightened disorganisation of labour relations with negative effects for both workers and management. The impact of neo-liberal and anti-trade union ideas initially inspired by the New Right in the United Kingdom and the United States of America during the 1980s has played a significant role in shaping the ideology behind this shift in EU policy towards ‘weaker states’. We therefore argue that this political heritage of disorganising labour relations carries great risks in social and organisational terms for all actors concerned, especially workers and their representatives. To this end, we develop the critique of deregulation outlined in Ewing et al (2016) and argue that coordinated structures are important for questions of social justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute of Employment Rights Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute of Employment Rights Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/INSTEMPLRIGHJ.2.1.0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Employment Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/INSTEMPLRIGHJ.2.1.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

新自由主义意识形态的持续流行和国家实施的紧缩措施的影响已经对欧盟(EU)内部的工业关系结构产生了有害影响,特别是在欧洲外围。本报告评估了受最近经济危机影响最严重的欧盟成员国的这些发展情况,即希腊、爱尔兰、意大利、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、斯洛文尼亚和西班牙。我们强调,在接受评估的国家中,工会通过集体协议管理工作条件的能力日益受到限制,这些协议有系统地恶化,使其难以维持动员和谈判战略。这对工资和工作时间产生了有害的影响。更广泛的紧缩措施也对劳动监察、司法程序和国家调解服务等领域产生了重大影响,导致劳资关系更加混乱,对工人和管理层都产生了负面影响。新自由主义和反工会思想的影响最初是由20世纪80年代英国和美国的新右翼所激发的,在塑造欧盟政策向“弱国”转变背后的意识形态方面发挥了重要作用。因此,我们认为,这种破坏劳动关系的政治遗产在社会和组织方面对所有相关行为者,特别是工人及其代表,都带来了巨大的风险。为此,我们发展了Ewing等人(2016)概述的放松管制的批评,并认为协调结构对社会正义问题很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The legacy of Thatcherism in European labour relations: the impact of the politics of neo-liberalism and austerity on collective bargaining in a fragmenting Europe
The ongoing popularity of neo-liberalist ideologies and the impact of state-imposed austerity measures has been having a detrimental impact on the structure of industrial relations within the European Union (EU), especially in the periphery of Europe. This report assesses these developments in the EU member states most affected by the most recent economic crisis, namely Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Spain. We highlight how trade unions in the countries assessed are increasingly constrained in their ability to regulate the conditions of work through collective agreements, which have systematically deteriorated, making it difficult to sustain mobilisation and negotiation strategies. This has had a deleterious effect on pay and working time. Broader austerity measures have also had a substantial impact on areas such as labour inspection, judicial processes and state mediation services, leading to heightened disorganisation of labour relations with negative effects for both workers and management. The impact of neo-liberal and anti-trade union ideas initially inspired by the New Right in the United Kingdom and the United States of America during the 1980s has played a significant role in shaping the ideology behind this shift in EU policy towards ‘weaker states’. We therefore argue that this political heritage of disorganising labour relations carries great risks in social and organisational terms for all actors concerned, especially workers and their representatives. To this end, we develop the critique of deregulation outlined in Ewing et al (2016) and argue that coordinated structures are important for questions of social justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信