形式批评

S. Travis
{"title":"形式批评","authors":"S. Travis","doi":"10.1163/9789004497511_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Form criticism of the New Testament has two aims―to classify the various New Testament books according to their literary genre (German Gattungsgeschichte), and to analyse the smaller units of traditional material according to the “form” or “shape” they have assumed during the oral, preliterary period. The German word Formgeschichte (“form-history”) is often used in a broader sense with reference to attempts to trace the development of units of tradition during the oral period and thus to make historical value-judgments on the material. But this is, strictly speaking, the function of “tradition criticism”, which is treated elsewhere in this volume. My contribution will be confined to the more purely analytical aspect of form criticism, and to units of tradition in the Gospels.","PeriodicalId":191472,"journal":{"name":"The Reform of King Josiah and the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Form Criticism\",\"authors\":\"S. Travis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004497511_007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Form criticism of the New Testament has two aims―to classify the various New Testament books according to their literary genre (German Gattungsgeschichte), and to analyse the smaller units of traditional material according to the “form” or “shape” they have assumed during the oral, preliterary period. The German word Formgeschichte (“form-history”) is often used in a broader sense with reference to attempts to trace the development of units of tradition during the oral period and thus to make historical value-judgments on the material. But this is, strictly speaking, the function of “tradition criticism”, which is treated elsewhere in this volume. My contribution will be confined to the more purely analytical aspect of form criticism, and to units of tradition in the Gospels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Reform of King Josiah and the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Reform of King Josiah and the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004497511_007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Reform of King Josiah and the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004497511_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《新约》的形式批评有两个目的——根据文学体裁(德语Gattungsgeschichte)对各种各样的《新约》书卷进行分类,并根据它们在口头、文学前时期所呈现的“形式”或“形状”来分析较小的传统材料单元。德语单词Formgeschichte(“形式-历史”)通常在更广泛的意义上使用,指的是试图追踪口述时期传统单位的发展,从而对材料做出历史价值判断。但是,严格地说,这是“传统批评”的功能,在本卷的其他地方讨论。我的贡献将局限于形式批评的更纯粹的分析方面,以及福音书中传统的单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Form Criticism
Form criticism of the New Testament has two aims―to classify the various New Testament books according to their literary genre (German Gattungsgeschichte), and to analyse the smaller units of traditional material according to the “form” or “shape” they have assumed during the oral, preliterary period. The German word Formgeschichte (“form-history”) is often used in a broader sense with reference to attempts to trace the development of units of tradition during the oral period and thus to make historical value-judgments on the material. But this is, strictly speaking, the function of “tradition criticism”, which is treated elsewhere in this volume. My contribution will be confined to the more purely analytical aspect of form criticism, and to units of tradition in the Gospels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信