俄罗斯政治现代化的利益与风险

I. Busygina, M. Filippov
{"title":"俄罗斯政治现代化的利益与风险","authors":"I. Busygina, M. Filippov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1736483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A government-proclaimed desire to promote technological innovation and boost economic growth in Russia implies the need for the state to take an active role in the economy and to provide the right stimuli and guarantees for investors. Since under its current political regime the Russian state lacks trust and credibility, and since the actions of the state to promote innovative economic development as well as its likelihood of succeeding depend on its type and characteristics, such an economic agenda would demand democratization. For entrepreneurs and investors, in its current form the Russian state is inefficient, riddled with corruption, lacking in accountability, and unpredictable. Most importantly, it cannot credibly commit to respect property rights and sustain the rules with which they are associated. Democratic reforms, ideally, could modernize the Russian state and make it simultaneously strong, limited, accountable, conducive to good governance and, thus, an effective agent of economic modernization. Yet the same Russian leadership that proclaims the vital importance of economic and technological innovation is reluctant to engage in political modernization, attempting instead to improve the existing model of governance by administrative methods.","PeriodicalId":126809,"journal":{"name":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits and Risks of Political Modernization in Russia\",\"authors\":\"I. Busygina, M. Filippov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1736483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A government-proclaimed desire to promote technological innovation and boost economic growth in Russia implies the need for the state to take an active role in the economy and to provide the right stimuli and guarantees for investors. Since under its current political regime the Russian state lacks trust and credibility, and since the actions of the state to promote innovative economic development as well as its likelihood of succeeding depend on its type and characteristics, such an economic agenda would demand democratization. For entrepreneurs and investors, in its current form the Russian state is inefficient, riddled with corruption, lacking in accountability, and unpredictable. Most importantly, it cannot credibly commit to respect property rights and sustain the rules with which they are associated. Democratic reforms, ideally, could modernize the Russian state and make it simultaneously strong, limited, accountable, conducive to good governance and, thus, an effective agent of economic modernization. Yet the same Russian leadership that proclaims the vital importance of economic and technological innovation is reluctant to engage in political modernization, attempting instead to improve the existing model of governance by administrative methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯政府宣称希望促进技术创新和促进经济增长,这意味着国家需要在经济中发挥积极作用,并为投资者提供正确的刺激和保障。由于在目前的政治体制下,俄罗斯国家缺乏信任和信誉,并且由于国家促进创新经济发展的行动及其成功的可能性取决于其类型和特征,因此这样的经济议程将需要民主化。对于企业家和投资者来说,目前的俄罗斯政府效率低下,腐败丛生,缺乏问责制,而且不可预测。最重要的是,它无法令人信服地承诺尊重产权,并维持与之相关的规则。理想情况下,民主改革可以使俄罗斯国家现代化,同时使其强大、有限、负责,有利于善治,从而成为经济现代化的有效代理人。然而,宣称经济和技术创新至关重要的俄罗斯领导层却不愿参与政治现代化,而是试图通过行政手段改善现有的治理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits and Risks of Political Modernization in Russia
A government-proclaimed desire to promote technological innovation and boost economic growth in Russia implies the need for the state to take an active role in the economy and to provide the right stimuli and guarantees for investors. Since under its current political regime the Russian state lacks trust and credibility, and since the actions of the state to promote innovative economic development as well as its likelihood of succeeding depend on its type and characteristics, such an economic agenda would demand democratization. For entrepreneurs and investors, in its current form the Russian state is inefficient, riddled with corruption, lacking in accountability, and unpredictable. Most importantly, it cannot credibly commit to respect property rights and sustain the rules with which they are associated. Democratic reforms, ideally, could modernize the Russian state and make it simultaneously strong, limited, accountable, conducive to good governance and, thus, an effective agent of economic modernization. Yet the same Russian leadership that proclaims the vital importance of economic and technological innovation is reluctant to engage in political modernization, attempting instead to improve the existing model of governance by administrative methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信