面对现实

Laura L. Presley
{"title":"面对现实","authors":"Laura L. Presley","doi":"10.22215/cpopp.v7i.3183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial recognition technology (FRT) is a tool employed by both public and private actors, with uses ranging from personalized marketing to security. However, FRT’s negative reputation for accuracy issues and potential privacy invasion has created cause for concern. Finding the balance between prioritizing respect for these ethical considerations and ensuring FRT's legitimate use is key to its future success. This paper argues that while Canada has made progress in mitigating privacy invasion issues, significant work must be done to address widespread accuracy issues within FRT systems.","PeriodicalId":193114,"journal":{"name":"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face the Facts\",\"authors\":\"Laura L. Presley\",\"doi\":\"10.22215/cpopp.v7i.3183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Facial recognition technology (FRT) is a tool employed by both public and private actors, with uses ranging from personalized marketing to security. However, FRT’s negative reputation for accuracy issues and potential privacy invasion has created cause for concern. Finding the balance between prioritizing respect for these ethical considerations and ensuring FRT's legitimate use is key to its future success. This paper argues that while Canada has made progress in mitigating privacy invasion issues, significant work must be done to address widespread accuracy issues within FRT systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22215/cpopp.v7i.3183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/cpopp.v7i.3183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面部识别技术(FRT)是公共和私人行为者使用的一种工具,用途从个性化营销到安全。然而,FRT在准确性问题和潜在隐私侵犯方面的负面声誉引起了人们的关注。在优先尊重这些道德考虑因素和确保FRT的合法使用之间找到平衡是其未来成功的关键。本文认为,虽然加拿大在减轻隐私侵犯问题方面取得了进展,但必须做大量工作来解决FRT系统中广泛存在的准确性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Face the Facts
Facial recognition technology (FRT) is a tool employed by both public and private actors, with uses ranging from personalized marketing to security. However, FRT’s negative reputation for accuracy issues and potential privacy invasion has created cause for concern. Finding the balance between prioritizing respect for these ethical considerations and ensuring FRT's legitimate use is key to its future success. This paper argues that while Canada has made progress in mitigating privacy invasion issues, significant work must be done to address widespread accuracy issues within FRT systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信