《蒙特利尔议定书》之后:“从摇篮到坟墓”问题对提案写作的影响

H. Sales
{"title":"《蒙特利尔议定书》之后:“从摇篮到坟墓”问题对提案写作的影响","authors":"H. Sales","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customer writing specifications, templates and scoring criteria naturally influence engineers' attitudes to proposal writing. They direct their main creative energies to the high-scoring parts, which receive most attention and care in the writing of them. Sustainability-related sections of the proposal may not be so highly rated and, as a consequence, are written with less flair than other more highly-rated sections. Writing features that detract from elegant, concise language are identified, and a strategy suggested for improving proposal writing for bid writing teams and editors in the future.","PeriodicalId":404833,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the montreal protocol: The impact of “cradle to grave” issues on proposal writing\",\"authors\":\"H. Sales\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Customer writing specifications, templates and scoring criteria naturally influence engineers' attitudes to proposal writing. They direct their main creative energies to the high-scoring parts, which receive most attention and care in the writing of them. Sustainability-related sections of the proposal may not be so highly rated and, as a consequence, are written with less flair than other more highly-rated sections. Writing features that detract from elegant, concise language are identified, and a strategy suggested for improving proposal writing for bid writing teams and editors in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客户写作规范、模板和评分标准自然会影响工程师对提案写作的态度。他们把主要的创作精力集中在得分较高的部分,这些部分在他们的写作中得到了最多的关注和照顾。提案中与可持续性相关的部分可能没有那么高的评价,因此,与其他评价较高的部分相比,写得没有那么有天赋。确定了有损优雅、简洁语言的写作特征,并提出了未来为投标写作团队和编辑改进提案写作的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
After the montreal protocol: The impact of “cradle to grave” issues on proposal writing
Customer writing specifications, templates and scoring criteria naturally influence engineers' attitudes to proposal writing. They direct their main creative energies to the high-scoring parts, which receive most attention and care in the writing of them. Sustainability-related sections of the proposal may not be so highly rated and, as a consequence, are written with less flair than other more highly-rated sections. Writing features that detract from elegant, concise language are identified, and a strategy suggested for improving proposal writing for bid writing teams and editors in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信